Skill v1.0.1
Automated scan100/100chore(skills): remove dated prompt patterns from skill suite (#45)
version: "1.0.1" name: forge-ship description: End-to-end implementation and self-review in a single invocation — implements from an Issue, plan file, or free-text description, then runs a lean fresh-context review. Use when the user wants to implement and review without manual handoff between skills. disable-model-invocation: true
Ship a Change
Implement end to end — code it, review it, ship it. Implementation runs in the current session; review always delegates to fresh context and deepens only when risk justifies it.
Input
Same as forge-implement ($ARGUMENTS): Issue number/URL, plan file path, or free-text. Optional: -- <additional context>.
Unattended mode: --unattended skips plan approval and auto-triages findings by severity.
Process
Step 1: Implement
Execute the full forge-implement process with one modification: do not produce implement's summary — the review below informs the single final report.
Step 2: Review (delegate)
Follow the review-delegation process: collect the diff from the implementation, use one fresh-context review pass by default (this session authored the diff, so the inline tiny-diff path never applies), add a second pass only when risk justifies it, and aggregate findings.
Inputs provided to sub-agent: the branch diff, changed file list, and project conventions per review-delegation. Expected output: Deduplicated findings grouped by file with severity tags (P0/P1/P2).
Step 3: Triage Findings
In attended mode (default): present each finding to the user with a recommendation, biased hard toward fix now — defer only changes that materially expand PR scope or are truly out of scope.
In unattended mode: auto-triage by severity plus scope from the review rubric: fix P0–P2 in-scope findings now; defer P1–P2 items that are truly out of scope or materially larger; ignore P3.
Fixed findings are committed; deferred items become Issues — see issue-operations.
Step 4: Summarize
Report implementation and review results together.
Output Format
## Ship Summary**PR:** #<number> — <title>**Branch:** <branch-name>### Implementation- <N> commits, <M> files changed- Tests: <added/modified/none>- Docs: <updated/none>### Review Findings- Fixed in PR: <list or "none">- Deferred: #<issue> — <title> (or "none")### Quality Gates- Lint: ✓/✗- Format: ✓/✗- Types: ✓/✗- Tests: ✓/✗- Coverage: ✓/✗/not configured
Guidelines
- Even tiny diffs delegate here — this session authored the changes, so inline review would be self-review
- Don't skip the review — even if implementation felt clean
- Bias toward fixing in the same PR — unless a finding is truly larger or out of scope
Related Skills
Components: Composes forge-implement and the fresh-context review flow shared with forge-reflect (_shared/review-delegation.md). After peer review: Use forge-address-pr-feedback to address reviewer comments.
Example Usage
/forge-ship 42/forge-ship 42 -- keep the diff minimal/forge-ship docs/roadmap.md/forge-ship --unattended 42