michaeldyrynda/dotfiles/pr

Claude Code and agent skill by michaeldyrynda/dotfiles

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Generates comprehensive PR descriptions and creates pull requests with proper context from git history. Invoke with /pr.

Install

npx vskill@latest install michaeldyrynda/dotfiles/pr

SKILL.md

You generate comprehensive PR descriptions and create pull requests using repository templates and context from git history.

Execution Flow

Step 1: Gather Context
bash
git branch --show-current
git log main..HEAD --oneline
git diff main --stat

If the branch targets a non-default base (e.g. a parent feature branch), diff against that base instead.

Step 2: Resolve PR Template
  1. Look for a PR template in the repository (common locations: .github/pull_request_template.md, .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, docs/pull_request_template.md)
  2. If a template exists: Read the entire file, extract exact section headings (including emoji if present), and use them verbatim in the PR body — do NOT use the fallback
  3. If no template exists: Use the fallback template described in Step 5
Step 3: Analyse Changes

Read the full diff (production code, not tests) to understand what behaviour changed. Identify:

  • New or changed rules, conditions, or decision logic
  • Changed values or constants — note old vs new
  • Removed or replaced behaviour
  • Structural refactors that affect how the system behaves

Do NOT catalogue files, classes, or methods. The goal is to understand the impact so a reviewer can answer: "what does this change mean?"

Step 4: Generate PR Title

Format: {type}: {concise description} — types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, chore.

Step 5: Generate PR Body

Use the template from Step 2. Populate each section from available sources (SUMMARY.md, git log, diff).

Writing Style
  • Present tense throughout — write "adds", "changes", "removes", not past ("added") or future ("will add"). The PR description describes what the code does now.
  • Describe the final state, not the journey — the description represents HEAD, not the sequence of commits that got there. Don't mention intermediate refactors, reverts, or iterations. A reader should understand what the branch does, not how it was developed.
  • Describe behaviour, not code — a reviewer needs to understand what logic changed, not which files were touched. Write about what the system does differently. Never list changed files, test files, or commit-by-commit narratives.
  • Use tables for before/after comparisons — when values change (constants, limits, configuration), present them in a table with old and new columns. Tables are scannable and make the scope of change immediately clear.
  • Group by logical concept, not by file — use subheadings that describe the change in domain terms, not implementation terms. Each group should describe one coherent behavioural change.
  • Call out new behaviour explicitly — if something didn't exist before, mark it clearly (e.g. "—" in the old column of a table, or "new" in prose).
  • Minor refactors get a light touch — if a refactor doesn't change behaviour (e.g. extracting a method, renaming for clarity, using an enum instead of a string), a single bullet under a "Minor refactors" subheading is sufficient. Don't over-explain mechanical changes.
Template Adherence
  • All template sections must be present — never remove a section from the template, even if it doesn't apply.
  • Inapplicable sections get `N/A` — write exactly N/A with no qualifier, explanation, or elaboration (not "N/A — backend only", not "No screenshots needed", just N/A).

Fallback (no repo template only): Include sections for Description (what and why), Related Links, Changes (categorised), Screenshots, and Notes (deviations, decisions, limitations).

Step 6: Verify Template Compliance

Whether using a repo template or the fallback: confirm all section headings are present (with exact emoji and wording if from a repo template). Confirm inapplicable sections contain only N/A. Confirm no bulleted file lists, test file enumerations, or commit-by-commit narratives.

Step 7: Push and Create PR

Optional arguments: --base {branch} (default: master), --draft (create as draft), --no-push (generate description only), --update {number} (update an existing PR's description only).

Always use --web allowing the user to review the PR before submitting.

When updating an existing PR (--update), skip push and creation — only update the body with gh pr edit.

bash
git push -u origin $(git branch --show-current)
gh pr create --title "{title}" --web --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
{body}
EOF
)"
Step 8: Report Success

Output: PR number, title, URL, files changed count, commit count.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
59
Repository forks
3
7-day trend score
20

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/michaeldyrynda/dotfiles/pr/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/michaeldyrynda/dotfiles/pr)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.