michaeldyrynda/dotfiles/pr
Claude Code and agent skill by michaeldyrynda/dotfiles
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Generates comprehensive PR descriptions and creates pull requests with proper context from git history. Invoke with /pr.
Install
npx vskill@latest install michaeldyrynda/dotfiles/prSKILL.md
You generate comprehensive PR descriptions and create pull requests using repository templates and context from git history.
Execution Flow
Step 1: Gather Context
If the branch targets a non-default base (e.g. a parent feature branch), diff against that base instead.
Step 2: Resolve PR Template
- Look for a PR template in the repository (common locations:
.github/pull_request_template.md,.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md,docs/pull_request_template.md) - If a template exists: Read the entire file, extract exact section headings (including emoji if present), and use them verbatim in the PR body — do NOT use the fallback
- If no template exists: Use the fallback template described in Step 5
Step 3: Analyse Changes
Read the full diff (production code, not tests) to understand what behaviour changed. Identify:
- New or changed rules, conditions, or decision logic
- Changed values or constants — note old vs new
- Removed or replaced behaviour
- Structural refactors that affect how the system behaves
Do NOT catalogue files, classes, or methods. The goal is to understand the impact so a reviewer can answer: "what does this change mean?"
Step 4: Generate PR Title
Format: {type}: {concise description} — types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, chore.
Step 5: Generate PR Body
Use the template from Step 2. Populate each section from available sources (SUMMARY.md, git log, diff).
Writing Style
- Present tense throughout — write "adds", "changes", "removes", not past ("added") or future ("will add"). The PR description describes what the code does now.
- Describe the final state, not the journey — the description represents HEAD, not the sequence of commits that got there. Don't mention intermediate refactors, reverts, or iterations. A reader should understand what the branch does, not how it was developed.
- Describe behaviour, not code — a reviewer needs to understand what logic changed, not which files were touched. Write about what the system does differently. Never list changed files, test files, or commit-by-commit narratives.
- Use tables for before/after comparisons — when values change (constants, limits, configuration), present them in a table with old and new columns. Tables are scannable and make the scope of change immediately clear.
- Group by logical concept, not by file — use subheadings that describe the change in domain terms, not implementation terms. Each group should describe one coherent behavioural change.
- Call out new behaviour explicitly — if something didn't exist before, mark it clearly (e.g. "—" in the old column of a table, or "new" in prose).
- Minor refactors get a light touch — if a refactor doesn't change behaviour (e.g. extracting a method, renaming for clarity, using an enum instead of a string), a single bullet under a "Minor refactors" subheading is sufficient. Don't over-explain mechanical changes.
Template Adherence
- All template sections must be present — never remove a section from the template, even if it doesn't apply.
- Inapplicable sections get `N/A` — write exactly
N/Awith no qualifier, explanation, or elaboration (not "N/A — backend only", not "No screenshots needed", justN/A).
Fallback (no repo template only): Include sections for Description (what and why), Related Links, Changes (categorised), Screenshots, and Notes (deviations, decisions, limitations).
Step 6: Verify Template Compliance
Whether using a repo template or the fallback: confirm all section headings are present (with exact emoji and wording if from a repo template). Confirm inapplicable sections contain only N/A. Confirm no bulleted file lists, test file enumerations, or commit-by-commit narratives.
Step 7: Push and Create PR
Optional arguments: --base {branch} (default: master), --draft (create as draft), --no-push (generate description only), --update {number} (update an existing PR's description only).
Always use --web allowing the user to review the PR before submitting.
When updating an existing PR (--update), skip push and creation — only update the body with gh pr edit.
Step 8: Report Success
Output: PR number, title, URL, files changed count, commit count.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingagents/skills/pr/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 59
- Repository forks
- 3
- 7-day trend score
- 20
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/michaeldyrynda/dotfiles/pr)