Skill v1.0.0
currentTrusted Publisher100/100version: "1.0.0" name: docs-corpus-audit description: >- Use this skill to run a holistic regrounding pass on the entire microsoft/apm documentation corpus against current source code, page-by-page, and emit surgical fixes for stale claims. Activate when the maintainer wants a WHOLE-CORPUS audit (not per-PR review) -- typical triggers include "audit the docs", "reground the corpus", "check every page against code", "pre-release docs sweep", "the docs have drifted everywhere", or "we just reshaped the TOC, find dead links". Wave-batched and S7-verified; scales to the full ~112-page corpus in ~10 minutes wall-time. This is a SIBLING to docs-sync, not a replacement: docs-sync is per-PR (triggered by a diff); this skill is per-corpus (triggered by a maintainer ask). They share agent personas, schemas, and the docs index, but their triggers MUST NOT collide. Does NOT auto-merge, does NOT push without maintainer review, and does NOT replace per-PR drift detection.
docs-corpus-audit -- whole-corpus regrounding pass
The docs corpus drifts silently between releases. docs-sync catches drift introduced by individual PRs at PR-open time. This skill catches the accumulated drift that slips past per-PR review -- stale flag names, dead nav links from past IA reshuffles, deprecation banners that outlived their version targets, factual claims whose source-side truth has moved.
The pattern is A1 PANEL + WAVE EXECUTION + S7 DETERMINISTIC TOOL BRIDGE + A8 ALIGNMENT LOOP + A9 SUPERVISED EXECUTION. The corpus is split into disjoint page scopes; one verifier subagent owns each scope; agents extract factual claims, S7-verify against source, apply surgical fixes inline. The orchestrator then runs an alignment-loop pass to re-verify that applied edits actually ground out true.
This skill is ADVISORY but ACTIONABLE: agents apply edits inline on a working branch. The orchestrator is the sole writer to git -- stages, commits, pushes. Maintainer reviews the resulting PR.
Sibling contract with docs-sync
These two skills share substrate. Be explicit:
| Shared resource | Owner | Both use | |
|---|---|---|---|
.apm/docs-index.yml (corpus map) | docs-sync | yes | |
| doc-writer persona | shared | yes (per-page edits) | |
| python-architect persona | shared | yes (S7 verification) | |
| editorial-owner persona | shared | optional (voice pass at scale) | |
| cdo persona | shared | yes (final synthesis) | |
assets/panelist-return-schema.json | docs-sync (mirrored) | yes |
Trigger boundary (avoid DISPATCH COLLISION):
docs-synctriggers on a PR event ("PR opened/synchronized",
source-diff-driven).
docs-corpus-audittriggers on a maintainer ask for a
WHOLE-CORPUS pass ("audit the corpus", "reground", "pre-release sweep") -- no PR required, no diff required, the whole corpus is the input.
If a maintainer asks "review this PR's doc impact", route to docs-sync. If they ask "audit all our docs" or "the docs feel stale everywhere", route here.
Architecture invariants
- Wave-batched, not flat. Pages are partitioned into 6-8 disjoint
scopes; each scope is one verifier subagent. Cost scales with wave size, not corpus size. A wave of 6 agents on ~10 pages each is the canonical shape.
- Disjoint page ownership. Each subagent has EDIT AUTHORITY on
its scope only. No two agents touch the same file -- guarantees no merge conflicts during fan-in.
- S7 verification is mandatory. Every factual claim is verified
against deterministic source: uv run apm <verb> --help for CLI, grep -n src/apm_cli/ for symbols, python -c "import ..." for module shape, file-existence checks for nav links. Never assert from LLM recall.
- Surgical edits only. 1-3 line patches per drift, preserving
voice. Restructuring is deferred to the orchestrator post-pass, never auto-applied by per-scope agents.
- Single-writer interlock for git. Subagents NEVER run
git commit, git push, or gh pr <write>. Orchestrator commits per wave; pushes once per session.
- Alignment loop (A8). After waves return, orchestrator
re-greps the corpus for the patterns the agents claimed to fix. Any residue triggers a targeted re-dispatch (max 2 redrafts) or is escalated to maintainer.
Roster (composition, not invention)
Reuse docs-sync's personas. Do NOT invent a one-off "grounding- verifier" role; that's R3 EXTRACT in reverse.
| Role | Persona | Always active? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per-scope verifier+editor | python-architect (S7) and doc-writer (edits), bundled into one subagent prompt per scope | Yes -- one per page scope, parallel fan-out | |
| Cross-corpus post-pass | orchestrator (deterministic greps via scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh) | Yes -- once after waves return | |
| Alignment-loop checker | orchestrator (deterministic re-grep + targeted re-dispatch) | Yes -- once after post-pass | |
| Voice pass (optional) | editorial-owner | Only when >20 edits to keep tone coherent | |
| Final synthesis | cdo | Once, for the PR summary comment |
The per-scope subagent prompt that composes python-architect + doc-writer is in assets/subagent-prompt-template.md -- the orchestrator substitutes scope + working dir + branch and dispatches via the task tool.
Process
1. PROBE (A9 SUPERVISED EXECUTION)- Check working tree: docs/src/content/docs/ exists?- Check working tree: packages/apm-guide/.apm/skills/apm-usage/exists? (Rule-4 backfill target. If missing, the audit cannotclose Rule 4; ask maintainer before continuing.)- Check `.apm/docs-index.yml` reachable.- Verify on a working branch (not main).2. RISK-TRIAGE (orchestrator, ~1 LLM call)- Read .apm/docs-index.yml only (NOT the corpus body).- Bucket pages by drift risk: HIGH (CLI ref, schemas, consumerflows), MEDIUM (producer, enterprise policy), LOW (concepts,contributing, troubleshooting, integrations).- Decide wave order: HIGH first, MEDIUM next, LOW last.3. WAVE-PLANNER (orchestrator, deterministic)- Partition pages into 6-8 disjoint scopes per wave.- Each agent gets ~9 pages, mixed surface types.4. WAVE EXECUTION (parallel, one subagent per scope)- Orchestrator dispatches one task per scope using the prompttemplate in assets/subagent-prompt-template.md.- Subagents read pages, extract claims, S7-verify, applysurgical edits, return JSON per the docs-sync panelistschema (mirrored at assets/panelist-return-schema.json).- Validate every return against the schema; reject malformedJSON.5. CROSS-CORPUS POST-PASS (orchestrator, deterministic)- Run scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh to grep for patternsa per-scope agent cannot see (IA-reshuffle dead links, staledeprecation version targets, phantom flag references).- Patch residue inline.6. ALIGNMENT LOOP (orchestrator, deterministic)- Re-run scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh.- Re-grep for claims the agents marked DRIFTED-FIXED.- If residue: targeted re-dispatch to the owning agent(bounded: max 2 redrafts per wave).7. COMMIT + PUSH (orchestrator, single writer)- One commit per wave; structured message naming closed items.- Push to working branch.8. PR + SUMMARY COMMENT (orchestrator)- If no PR exists: open one with the [pr-description-skill](../pr-description-skill/SKILL.md).- Post per-wave summary comment: pages audited, drift caught,fixes applied, items deferred, alignment-loop residue.
Bundled assets
assets/subagent-prompt-template.md-- the per-scope prompt the
orchestrator substitutes and dispatches. Composes python-architect (S7) + doc-writer (surgical edit). Loaded once per scope.
assets/panelist-return-schema.json-- subagent return schema,
mirrored from docs-sync. Loaded once at wave start; validated against every return.
scripts/scan-cross-corpus-drift.sh-- deterministic grep sweep
for cross-corpus patterns (IA dead links, stale deprecation targets, phantom flags). Non-interactive; emits structured matches on stdout, diagnostics on stderr. Run --help for pattern list. Update this script after each major IA reshuffle.
Cost model
| Wave size | Pages | Subagents | LLM dispatches | Wall time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small | ~30 | 4 | ~5 | ~3 min | |
| Medium (default) | ~55 | 6 | ~7 | ~5 min | |
| Large | ~110 (full corpus) | 12 (two medium waves) | ~14 | ~10 min |
Compared to docs-sync (15-call flat ceiling), this skill scales as O(waves), not O(claims), because per-agent work fits in one context window. S7 verification dominates wall-time, not LLM cost.
Boundary (what this skill does NOT do)
- Per-PR doc-impact review -- use
docs-sync. - Single-page typo or copy edit -- direct edit is faster.
- Writing docs for a brand-new feature -- use
docs-impact-architect
and doc-writer directly.
- Auto-merging or pushing without maintainer review.
- Reviewing code quality, security, or test coverage (out of scope).
Evals
See evals/:
evals/content-evals.json-- 3 corpus snapshots with seeded drift
(stale CLI flag, dead nav link, expired deprecation target); expected behavior is that the skill catches all three and applies surgical fixes that ground out true on re-verification.
evals/trigger-evals.json-- 10 should-trigger + 10 should-NOT-
trigger queries, 60/40 train/val. The val split is the ship gate (>=0.5 should-trigger AND <0.5 should-not-trigger).
evals/README.md-- how to run.
Provenance
This skill was extracted from a real session that audited the microsoft/apm corpus across 3 waves (PR #1511, 2026-05-27): 112/112 pages audited, 49 surgical fixes, ~25 LLM dispatches, ~30 min wall-time. The session design artifact (genesis hand-off packet) lives in session state, not in this bundle (maintainer- scope, not runtime-loaded).