version: "1.0.0" name: assign-issue description: Assign GitHub issues to the right person based on technical area ownership and historical patterns. Use when auto-assigning new issues, finding the right owner, or routing issues to area experts. Triggers on "assign issue", "find owner for issue", "who should handle this issue", and "route this issue".

Assign Issue Skill

Assign a GitHub issue to an appropriate owner using repository-defined area ownership and historical assignment patterns.

Inputs

• An issue reference (owner/repo and issue number, or an issue URL).
• Optional assignment constraints supplied by the user.

Behavior precedence

Within assignment, explicit current-user instructions take precedence over validated assignment customization, which takes precedence over the static mapping, historical search, confidence, and output defaults below. Neither may change the assignment role, authorize an unrequested write, remove existing assignees, assign unsupported principals, or override global security and repository-scope boundaries.

Assignment Strategies

Static area mapping

Follow the issuelens-config skill and call the issuelens-config tool for domain assignment. The tool uses a configured path when present. When .github/issuelens.yml is absent or omits assignment, it preserves the legacy area-owner search order:

1. .github/area_owners.md
2. docs/area_owners.md
3. area_owners.md

Subject to explicit user constraints, match the issue title, body, labels, and mentioned file paths against the areas' keywords and path patterns. The format is described in references/area_owners_template.md. If the source is built-in, no static mapping exists and historical patterns are the primary strategy. If configuration loading fails, stop and do not assign anyone.

Historical patterns

Use the available GitHub issue-search operation to find similar closed (and recently resolved) issues in the same repository:

1. Search using the most specific terms from the issue title, body, and labels.
2. Prefer issues updated in the last 6 to 12 months.
3. Inspect up to 20 relevant results and count their assignees.
4. Rank candidates by assignment frequency and similarity to the target issue,

and choose the top-ranked individual as the proposed assignee.

Do not infer ownership from issue authorship alone.

By default, this is the primary strategy when the repository has no area-owner file. In that case, always run this search and assign the best-matching individual from the historical data (see the Workflow). Only skip assignment when the search returns no similar issues with a clear, recurring assignee.

Default workflow

1. Read the target issue and preserve its existing assignees.
2. Apply the static area mapping when an area-owner file exists.
3. Analyze similar closed issues for historical assignee patterns.
4. Combine the evidence:

• Both strategies agree: high confidence.
• One strategy produces a clear match: medium confidence.
• No area-owner file: rely on historical patterns — if similar past

issues have a clear, recurring top assignee, treat it as medium confidence and assign that individual.

• Strategies conflict or evidence is weak: low confidence; report candidates

and do not assign automatically.

1. For a medium- or high-confidence individual user, update the issue with the

available assignment operation. Pass the union of existing assignees and the selected username so no current assignment is removed.

1. Read the issue again and confirm that the selected assignee is present.
2. Report the decision, evidence, and whether the write was confirmed.

Rules

• Use only the bundled IssueLens GitHub MCP tools for every GitHub read or

write. Pass the explicit owner/repository to every read, search, and write. Never use a shell command, bundled script, direct HTTP request, or GitHub CLI command.

• Never remove or replace existing assignees.
• Do not assign a team handle directly; GitHub issue assignees must be

individual users. Resolve a team to an eligible individual only when the available GitHub tools provide enough evidence; otherwise report the team as a routing suggestion.

• Treat a failed or unconfirmed write as a suggestion, not a completed action.
• If no area-owner file exists, use historical patterns as the primary strategy:

search similar past issues and assign the most frequent / most relevant individual assignee. Only skip assignment when the historical evidence yields no reasonable candidate.

• If no confident match exists, do not guess and do not modify the issue.

Default output

• Assigned to: the selected username, or None.
• Confidence: High, Medium, or Low.
• Reasoning: the area match and historical evidence.
• Existing assignees: assignees preserved by the update.
• Action taken: assignment confirmed, assignment failed, or manual review

suggested.