version: "1.0.0"

/pmf-review

Objective

Evaluate PMF/FMF signal quality and identify the highest-risk product assumptions.

Inputs

• Product concept and target segment
• Existing evidence and confidence level
• Key distribution/retention assumptions

Output contract

• PMF/FMF risk summary
• Evidence quality labels (strong, partial, assumption)
• Next 1-3 validation actions

Role boundary

• This skill does not perform detailed UX heuristic audits.
• Hands interaction-level critique to /ux-review.

Personal Perspective Checkpoint (Mandatory)

• Ask at strategy gate: "Which signal would actually change your mind?"
• Ask at conflict gate: if interview pain conflicts with behavioral data, present both views and propose one falsification test.
• Ask before irreversible recommendation: "Continue, narrow, or reposition?"

Security constraints

• No fabricated market stats, competitive intel, or user interview quotes.
• Separate observed evidence from assumptions.