mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/systematic-debugging-codex

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Systematic 4-phase debugging with Codex-backed root cause investigation. Use only when the user explicitly asks for the Codex-backed debugging workflow.

Install

npx vskill@latest install mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/systematic-debugging-codex

SKILL.md

Systematic Debugging

Keep Claude in the main thread for user interaction and fix decisions. Call codex_debug for bounded root cause investigation (Phases 1-3). Call codex_implement / codex_resume for applying fixes (Phase 4).

Core principle: ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

The Iron Law

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

<HARD-GATE> Do NOT propose or attempt ANY fix until codex_debug has returned root cause evidence. No exceptions — no matter how obvious the bug seems. If you catch yourself about to fix something without Codex investigation output, STOP. </HARD-GATE>

Checklist

You MUST complete these steps in order:

Phases 1-3: Investigation (Codex)
  1. Gather context — collect error messages, stack traces, reproduction steps, recent changes from the user or logs. This is Claude's job.
  1. Dispatch investigator — call the codex_debug MCP tool.

Pass a full prompt body with the reproduction steps, current evidence, recent changes, and the exact question Codex should answer.

json
{
"tool": "codex_debug",
"arguments": {
"prompt": "Investigate why Codex-backed agents are still doing repository work locally instead of forwarding through the adapter. Include the current failure mode, relevant files, and the strongest root-cause hypothesis supported by code evidence.",
"workspaceRoot": "/absolute/path/to/your/repo"
}
}
  1. Handle the response:
  • Success (`result` populated): the investigation conforms to schemas/debug-investigation.schema.json (root_cause, evidence, working_examples, hypothesis, suggested_fix). Proceed to validate (Step 4).
  • Weak or missing evidence: re-dispatch codex_debug with a sharper prompt naming the missing pieces (or surface a blocker to the user when needed).
  • Error (no `result`): inspect stderrTail and the resume hint in the error message; resume with codex_resume(taskId="…") once the cause is resolved.
  1. Review investigation — Claude validates root_cause and hypothesis are supported by evidence. If evidence is weak, re-dispatch with a more focused prompt.

<HARD-GATE> Do NOT proceed to Phase 4 until codex_debug output is reviewed and the root cause hypothesis is confirmed with supporting evidence. Weak evidence = re-investigate. </HARD-GATE>

Phase 4: Fix
  1. Decide fix approach:
  • Simple fix (1-2 lines, obvious from root cause) → Claude implements directly
  • Complex fix → dispatch codex_implement with the root cause and suggested fix
  1. Implement single fix — ONE change addressing the root cause. No "while I'm here" improvements. No bundled refactoring.
  1. Handle implementer status (when Step 5 dispatched `codex_implement`):
Status (from result.status)Action
DONEProceed to verify (Step 8)
DONE_WITH_CONCERNSRead concerns; verify regardless, then triage the concerns (resume via codex_resume if blocking)
NEEDS_CONTEXTProvide the requested context and resume the same task with codex_resume(taskId="…") — do NOT re-dispatch as a new implement call
BLOCKEDSurface the blocker to the user; if it invalidates the root cause, return to Step 2

On error (no result), inspect stderrTail and use the resume hint in the error message to continue via codex_resume.

  1. Verify fix — run tests, confirm resolution, check no regressions.
  1. If fix fails:
  • Count attempts. If < 3: return to Step 2, re-investigate with new information
  • If >= 3: STOP and question the architecture (see below)

When 3+ Fixes Fail

Pattern indicating architectural problem:

  • Each fix reveals new shared state/coupling in different places
  • Fixes require "massive refactoring" to implement
  • Each fix creates new symptoms elsewhere

STOP and question fundamentals — discuss with your human partner before attempting more fixes. This is NOT a failed hypothesis; this is a wrong architecture.

Red Flags — STOP and Re-investigate

If you catch yourself thinking any of these, return to Step 2:

  • "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
  • "Just try changing X and see if it works"
  • "It's probably X, let me fix that"
  • "I don't fully understand but this might work"
  • Proposing solutions before reviewing Codex investigation output
  • "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)

Supporting Techniques

Available in this directory:

  • `root-cause-tracing.md` — Trace bugs backward through call stack
  • `defense-in-depth.md` — Add validation at multiple layers after finding root cause
  • `condition-based-waiting.md` — Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
7
Repository forks
2
7-day trend score
10

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/systematic-debugging-codex/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/systematic-debugging-codex)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.