<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentLLM-judged scan90/100
oasm-platform/open-asm/network-service-testing
──Details
PublishedOctober 22, 2026 at 11:00 PM
Content Hashsha256:ce160d210ee9bb75...
Git SHA0fc061d0c062
──Files
Files (1 file, 4.1 KB)
SKILL.md4.1 KBactive
SKILL.md · 49 lines · 4.1 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: network-service-testing description: Methodology for authorized, non-destructive assessment of exposed non-web network services — TLS/SSL posture, SSH, mail, databases, file shares, admin and remote-access ports — for misconfiguration, weak crypto and dangerous exposure. Use when testing open ports and services rather than web apps.


Network & service testing

Use this skill to assess the exposed non-web services on a host: what is listening, whether it should be, and whether it is configured safely. The goal is to find dangerous exposure and misconfiguration — not to break in. Everything here is read-mostly and non-destructive; you identify and demonstrate a weakness, you do not brute-force or disrupt the service.

When to use

  • Recon found open ports and you need to assess the services behind them.
  • A host exposes TLS, SSH, mail, a database, a file share or an admin/remote-access port.
  • You need to judge whether a listening service is safely configured or dangerously exposed.

Goal and todo first (Agent mode)

formulate_plan(steps), then transition_step(id, "in_progress"). Goal, e.g. "Assess the exposed services on 203.0.113.10 for misconfiguration and weak TLS, with evidence". First step: read known ports (list_network_ports) and TLS (verify_tls_settings).

How to work

  1. Inventory the listening services. list_network_ports for what the workspace knows; naabu (built-in) to confirm open ports; a service/version scanner (nmap, if display_available_tools lists it isReady) for banners and versions on the ports that matter. Keep scans narrow and rate-limited.
  2. Classify each service. For every open port decide: should this be internet-facing at all? Management, database, and file-share ports exposed publicly are themselves findings regardless of their config.
  3. Assess by service type (the ones that apply):
  • TLS/SSL (443, 8443, mail/DB TLS): verify_tls_settings for protocol versions, cipher strength, certificate validity, expiry and hostname match. Flag deprecated protocols (SSLv3, TLS 1.0/1.1), weak ciphers, expired or mismatched certs.
  • SSH: version, offered key-exchange/ciphers/MACs, whether password auth is allowed. Report weak algorithms and exposure — do not attempt credential guessing.
  • Mail (SMTP/IMAP/POP): open relay indicators, missing STARTTLS, exposed auth. Check configuration signals, not live abuse.
  • Databases / caches (MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, Redis, Elastic, …): the real finding is usually exposure itself — reachable from outside, or unauthenticated. Confirm reachability and auth-required state; never dump data.
  • File shares / RPC (SMB, NFS, RPC): anonymous/guest readability and exposed shares — confirm the exposure, do not exfiltrate contents.
  • Admin & remote access (RDP, VNC, Telnet, management consoles): these should rarely be public; exposure and weak/legacy protocols are the finding.
  1. Confirm, don't intrude. Verify a weakness exists with the lightest check; hand real confirmation to exploit-verification.

Tools

  • Built-in and reliable: naabu (ports), httpx (service probing), and the workspace tools list_network_ports, verify_tls_settings, fingerprint_technologies.
  • Deeper probes (nmap scripts, testssl, …) only when display_available_tools shows them ready; otherwise note the gap and work with what you have.
  • execute_remote_command for safe one-off checks (dig, curl -sI, a single banner grab). Read long output with read_tool_output and a pattern.

Safety

  • Respect approvals; do not retry a rejected step.
  • No brute force, no credential spraying, no denial of service, no data exfiltration, no changes to the service.
  • A service that is simply exposed when it should not be is a finding on its own — report it without trying to log in.

Output

Per host: the open ports and the service/version on each, which exposures are dangerous and why, TLS/crypto weaknesses with specifics, and prioritized remediation (close the port, restrict the source, upgrade the protocol, require auth). Mark anything unconfirmed as such.

All versions