open-agreements/open-agreements/soc2-readiness

Claude Code and agent skill by open-agreements/open-agreements

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Assess SOC 2 Type II readiness. Map Trust Services Criteria to controls, identify gaps, and build a remediation plan. Uses NIST SP 800-53 (public domain) as canonical reference with SOC 2 criterion cross-mapping. Use when user says "SOC 2 readiness," "SOC 2 preparation," "SOC 2 gap analysis," or "prepare for SOC 2 audit."

Install

npx vskill@latest install open-agreements/open-agreements/soc2-readiness

SKILL.md

SOC 2 Readiness Assessment

Assess readiness for a SOC 2 Type II audit. This skill walks through the Trust Services Criteria, identifies gaps, maps to NIST controls, and generates a prioritized remediation plan.

Security Model

  • No scripts executed — markdown-only procedural guidance
  • No secrets required — works with reference checklists
  • IP-clean — AICPA Trust Services Criteria are publicly cited; descriptions are original writing
  • Evidence stays local — all collection outputs go to local filesystem

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  1. First SOC 2 preparation — building controls from scratch for initial Type I or Type II
  2. Pre-audit readiness check — 4-8 weeks before audit window opens
  3. Gap analysis after scope change — new systems, services, or trust criteria added
  4. Remediation planning — translating audit findings into actionable work items
  5. Dual-framework mapping — already pursuing ISO 27001 and need SOC 2 overlap analysis

Do NOT use for:

  • ISO 27001 internal audit — use iso-27001-internal-audit
  • Evidence collection mechanics — use iso-27001-evidence-collection
  • Contract review — use legal agreement skills

Core Concepts

Trust Services Criteria (TSC)

SOC 2 is organized around 5 Trust Services Categories. Security (CC) is always in scope; others are optional based on your service:

CategoryCriteriaWhen Required
Security (CC)CC 1-9 (33 criteria)Always required
Availability (A)A 1.1-1.3 (3 criteria)SaaS with uptime SLAs
Processing Integrity (PI)PI 1.1-1.5 (4 criteria)Data processing services
Confidentiality (C)C 1.1-1.2 (2 criteria)Handling confidential data
Privacy (P)P 4-8 (7 criteria)PII processing
SOC 2 vs. ISO 27001
DimensionSOC 2ISO 27001
Governing bodyAICPAISO/IEC
GeographyPrimarily US/CanadaGlobal
TypeAttestation report by CPACertification by audit body
ScopeService-specificOrganization-wide ISMS
ControlsFlexible (you define)93 Annex A controls
OutputSOC 2 report (restricted/general use)Certificate
Overlap~70% overlap with ISO 27001 Annex A~70% overlap with SOC 2 CC
Decision Tree: Scope Selection
What service are you getting audited on?
├── SaaS product → Security + Availability (+ Confidentiality if you handle sensitive data)
├── Data processing → Security + Processing Integrity + Confidentiality
├── Infrastructure → Security + Availability
├── API service → Security (+ PI if you transform data)
│
Do you handle PII?
├── YES → Add Privacy category
├── NO → Skip Privacy
│
Do you have uptime SLAs?
├── YES → Include Availability
├── NO → Optional (but customers expect it for SaaS)

Step-by-Step Workflow

Step 1: Define Scope and Categories
  1. Identify the service being audited (product name, description, boundaries)
  2. Select Trust Services Categories using the decision tree above
  3. Define system boundaries: infrastructure, software, people, procedures, data
  4. Document sub-service organizations (cloud providers, payment processors, etc.)
  5. Determine audit type: Type I (point-in-time) or Type II (period of time, usually 6-12 months)
Step 2: Assess Current State

For each applicable Common Criterion (CC), assess whether controls are:

  • Designed — control exists on paper
  • Implemented — control is operating
  • Effective — control achieves its objective (evidence exists)
# If Internal ISO Audit MCP server is available (SOC 2 maps to ISO 27001 Annex A):
list_controls(domain="technological") # List tech controls (maps to CC 6-8)
get_control_guidance(control_id="A.5.15") # Get guidance for ISO control mapped from CC 6.1
get_nist_mapping(control_id="AC-2", direction="nist_to_iso") # Find ISO controls from NIST reference
search_guidance(query="incident response") # Search for controls matching SOC 2 criteria
Step 3: Map Controls to Criteria

Each CC maps to specific NIST controls. Use this mapping to identify what you need:

CC 1 — Control Environment
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 1.1Integrity and ethicsPS-1, PS-3, PS-6A.6.1, A.6.2, A.6.4
CC 1.2Board oversightPM-1, PM-2C.5.1, C.5.3
CC 1.3Organizational structurePM-2C.5.3
CC 1.4Competence commitmentAT-2, PS-3A.6.1, A.6.3
CC 1.5AccountabilityPS-3, PS-4A.6.4, A.6.5
CC 2 — Communication and Information
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 2.1Internal informationAU-2, SI-5C.7.5.1
CC 2.2Internal communicationPM-2, AT-2C.7.4, A.6.3
CC 2.3External communicationPM-1A.5.14
CC 3 — Risk Assessment
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 3.1Risk objectivesPM-9, RA-1C.6.1.1
CC 3.2Risk identificationRA-3C.6.1.2, C.8.2
CC 3.3Fraud riskRA-3C.6.1.2
CC 3.4Change impactRA-3, CM-4C.6.1.2, A.8.9
CC 4 — Monitoring Activities
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 4.1Ongoing monitoringCA-7, PM-6C.9.1
CC 4.2Deficiency evaluationCA-2C.9.2.1
CC 5 — Control Activities
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 5.1Risk mitigationAC-5A.5.3
CC 5.2Technology controlsAC-1, IA-2A.5.15, A.8.5
CC 5.3Policy deploymentPM-1, PL-1A.5.1, C.5.2
CC 6 — Logical and Physical Access
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 6.1Access controlAC-2, AC-3, IA-2, SC-28A.5.15, A.8.5, A.8.24
CC 6.2Access provisioningAC-2, PS-4, PS-5A.5.18, A.6.5
CC 6.3Access modificationAC-2, AC-6A.5.15, A.5.18
CC 6.4Physical accessPE-2, PE-3, PE-6A.7.2, A.7.4
CC 6.5Asset disposalMP-6A.7.10, A.7.14
CC 6.6Threat detectionRA-5, SI-4A.8.8, A.8.16
CC 6.7Transmission securitySC-8A.5.14, A.8.24
CC 6.8Malware preventionSI-2, SI-3A.8.7, A.8.19
CC 7 — System Operations
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 7.1Operational monitoringCM-6, RA-5A.8.9, A.8.8
CC 7.2Anomaly detectionAU-6, SI-4A.8.15, A.8.16
CC 7.3Incident responseIR-4A.5.24, A.5.25
CC 7.4Incident managementIR-5, IR-6A.5.25, A.5.26
CC 7.5RecoveryCP-4, CP-9, CP-10A.5.30, A.8.13
CC 8 — Change Management
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 8.1Change controlCM-3, CM-5, SA-3A.8.9, A.8.25, A.8.32
CC 9 — Risk Mitigation
CriterionFocusNIST ControlsISO Cross-Reference
CC 9.1Risk mitigationCP-2, RA-7A.5.30, C.6.1.3
CC 9.2Vendor managementAC-20, SA-9A.5.19, A.5.22
Step 4: Generate Gap Analysis

For each criterion, document:

markdown
## Gap: [CC x.x] — [Brief description]
**Current State**: [What exists today]
**Required State**: [What the auditor expects]
**Gap**: [What's missing]
**Remediation**:
1.[Specific action item]
2.[Specific action item]
**Priority**: Critical / High / Medium / Low
**Effort**: [Days/weeks to remediate]
**Owner**: [Person responsible]
**Evidence Needed**: [What to collect after fix]
Step 5: Build Remediation Plan

Prioritize gaps by:

  1. Critical — Audit will fail without this (CC 6.1, 6.2, 7.2, 7.5, 8.1)
  2. High — Likely finding if not addressed (CC 1.4, 3.2, 6.6, 7.3)
  3. Medium — Auditor will note but may not be a finding
  4. Low — Best practice, not strictly required
Step 6: Readiness Report

Generate a structured readiness assessment:

  1. Executive summary — overall readiness percentage, estimated time to audit-ready
  2. Scope — service description, trust categories, audit type
  3. Control matrix — all applicable criteria with status (designed/implemented/effective)
  4. Gap analysis — prioritized list of gaps with remediation plan
  5. Timeline — remediation milestones leading to audit window

Quick Reference: Top SOC 2 Failures

#CriterionCommon FailureFix
1CC 6.1MFA not universalEnforce MFA on all systems with sensitive data
2CC 6.2Access not revoked on terminationAutomate deprovisioning; verify within 24h
3CC 7.2No log monitoringConfigure alerts for auth failures, privilege changes
4CC 8.1No change managementRequire PR reviews; document deployment process
5CC 7.5Backups never testedRestore from backup quarterly; document results
6CC 3.2No risk assessmentConduct and document annual risk assessment
7CC 6.6No vulnerability scanningDeploy automated scanning; remediate criticals in 30d
8CC 1.4Security training incompleteRequire annual training; track completion
9CC 9.2Vendor risk not assessedMaintain vendor register; collect SOC 2 reports
10CC 7.3No incident response planDocument plan; conduct tabletop exercise

DO / DON'T

DO
  • Start with Security (CC) criteria — they're always required and cover ~80% of effort
  • Map to ISO 27001 if pursuing both frameworks — ~70% control overlap
  • Collect evidence throughout the audit period, not just at audit time
  • Include sub-service organizations in your description
  • Define the audit period before starting evidence collection
DON'T
  • Include trust categories you can't support — better to pass on fewer than fail on more
  • Assume Type I is "easy" — it requires all controls to be designed and implemented
  • Forget the system description — auditors review this first and use it to scope their testing
  • Use generic/template control descriptions — auditors expect your controls to match your actual environment
  • Ignore complementary user entity controls (CUECs) — your customers need to know their responsibilities

Troubleshooting

ProblemSolution
First SOC 2, no existing controlsStart with CC 6 (access) and CC 8 (change management) — fastest to implement
Already have ISO 27001Map Annex A controls to SOC 2 CC; ~70% are already covered
Auditor requests evidence we don't haveCollect it now; document the process; note in description if control was implemented mid-period
Multiple environments (prod/staging/dev)Only production environment needs to be in scope; document boundaries clearly
Sub-service org (AWS/GCP/Azure)Use SOC 2 Type II report from the provider; document which controls they cover

Rules

For detailed SOC 2-specific guidance:

This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
41
Repository forks
8
7-day trend score
19

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/open-agreements/open-agreements/soc2-readiness/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/open-agreements/open-agreements/soc2-readiness)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.