version: "1.0.0" context: fork name: docs-review-security description: >- Scan documentation for sensitive data before publication — real IP addresses, credentials, internal hostnames, email addresses, and MAC addresses. Use this skill when asked to check for PII, security issues, customer-sensitive data, or before publishing documentation. Runs a deterministic regex scanner first, then applies agent judgment for patterns regex cannot catch.

Security and PII review skill

Scan documentation for sensitive data that must not appear in published content: real IP addresses, credentials, internal hostnames, customer-identifying information, and other PII.

This skill has two layers:

1. Deterministic scan — run pii_scanner.py for regex-based detection
2. Agent analysis — review for patterns regex cannot catch

Layer 1: Run the scanner

Run the PII scanner against the target files:

python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pii_scanner.py scan <file1> <file2> ...

Or for a docs directory:

python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pii_scanner.py scan --docs-dir <path> [--scan-dirs modules,topics] [--file-types .adoc,.md,.dita]

Parse the JSON output. If findings exist, include them in the report grouped by severity (critical first, then warning).

Layer 2: Agent analysis checklist

After the scanner runs, review the content for patterns that regex cannot reliably detect:

Customer-sensitive data in YAML/JSON examples

• [ ] CR metadata.name fields use generic names (example-<kind>) not customer-specific names
• [ ] CR metadata.namespace fields use generic namespaces, not customer project names
• [ ] resourceName, hostname, and similar fields do not contain real customer identifiers
• [ ] No customer application names appear — use "the custom application" or a generic name

Internal references

• [ ] No internal Jira project keys or ticket numbers that expose internal tooling
• [ ] No internal wiki, Confluence, or Google Doc URLs
• [ ] No internal Slack channel names or references
• [ ] No references to internal build systems, CI/CD pipelines, or staging environments

Sensitive patterns in prose

• [ ] No real person names associated with accounts, cases, or examples
• [ ] No real organization or company names in examples (use "Example Corp" or similar)
• [ ] No internal Red Hat team names or org chart references in customer-facing content
• [ ] No case numbers, account numbers, or subscription IDs from real customers

LUN WWIDs (if applicable)

• [ ] World Wide IDs use the generic pattern: 3600000000000000000aaaaaaaaaaaaaa
• [ ] If differentiation is needed, vary the end characters: ...bbbbbbbbbbbbbb

How to report

For each finding, report:

• File and line number
• Category (ip, email, credential, url, mac, internal_hostname, or agent-detected)
• Severity: critical (credentials, private keys) or warning (IPs, emails, URLs)
• Suggestion: the safe replacement (RFC 5737 IP, @example.com email, etc.)

Example invocations

• "Scan this file for PII and sensitive data"
• "Run a security review on the installation guide"
• "Check these docs for credentials and internal hostnames before we publish"