opendfm/xcientist/science-execution
Claude Code and agent skill by opendfm/xcientist
Trust tier 3
- community
Source check pending
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Execute unified science conditions through reviewer and hook gates
Install
npx vskill@latest install opendfm/xcientist/science-executionSKILL.md
Science Execution
Mission
Execute exactly one science condition from the planner, preserving raw evidence and completing only through the prefinish reviewer and hook gate.
Key Principles
- No hardcoding: Read dataset, model, API, and command bindings from validated prepare/code/science plan artifacts.
- Real data only: Use
dataset_candidate/data, not synthetic or random data. - Unified conditions: Treat all-components and component-disabled runs as the same kind of science condition; only their component sets differ.
Internal Loop
- Read the assigned condition contract, planner blueprint, validated prepare artifacts, code handoff, and existing science evidence.
- Run from the workspace root. Do not
cd project. - Execute the exact command or a faithful repaired command that preserves the declared component set.
- Keep raw outputs under the declared
results/science/<condition_id>/subtree. - Write controlled evidence manifests only through artifact tools under
agent_reports/science/evidence/. - Stop with the required worker JSON; the prefinish hook persists worker/review/hook reports and returns feedback in the same session if anything fails.
Condition Rules
- All-components conditions have
disabled_components: []and can serve as references. - Component-disabled conditions must use the declared disable/toggle mechanism and reference a passed all-components condition.
- The evidence must show the declared component set, command, dataset binding, metrics, output paths, and logs.
- Do not write final
ablation_results.json; final materialization is runtime-owned.
Hard Rules
- Do not produce final verdict while required coverage is missing.
- Reviewer report and hook receipt are the completion authority; summaries are human-readable only.
- Import tests, package checks, tiny snippets, smoke/debug/subset runs, and dry runs do not count as formal science evidence.
- Do not hardcode dataset names, model IDs, or API keys in experiment commands.
Reviewer result Labels
The reviewer's result field is a vocabulary, not free text. Finalization accepts:
positive— removing this component clearly hurts the metric (component helps).negative— removing this component clearly helps the metric (component hurts).neutral— the ablation ran end-to-end but the metric difference is within noise or practically small.inconclusive— the ablation ran end-to-end but the evidence does not support a directional conclusion; it is valid symbolic memory whenfollow_up_required: false.
Use follow_up_required: true to block completion when the run failed, coverage is missing, or evidence is insufficient to trust the condition. Do not use the inconclusive label itself as a blocker.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingsrc/agents/experiment_agent/skills/science-execution/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/opendfm/xcientist/science-execution)