pr-e/openclaw-master-skills/data-analysis
Trust tier 3
- community
Source check pending
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Turn raw data into decisions with statistical rigor, proper methodology, and awareness of analytical pitfalls.
Install
npx vskill@latest install pr-e/openclaw-master-skills/data-analysisSKILL.md
When to Load
User asks about: analyzing data, finding patterns, understanding metrics, testing hypotheses, cohort analysis, A/B testing, churn analysis, statistical significance.
Core Principle
Analysis without a decision is just arithmetic. Always clarify: What would change if this analysis shows X vs Y?
Methodology First
Before touching data:
- What decision is this analysis supporting?
- What would change your mind? (the real question)
- What data do you actually have vs what you wish you had?
- What timeframe is relevant?
Statistical Rigor Checklist
- [ ] Sample size sufficient? (small N = wide confidence intervals)
- [ ] Comparison groups fair? (same time period, similar conditions)
- [ ] Multiple comparisons? (20 tests = 1 "significant" by chance)
- [ ] Effect size meaningful? (statistically significant ≠ practically important)
- [ ] Uncertainty quantified? ("12-18% lift" not just "15% lift")
Analytical Pitfalls to Catch
| Pitfall | What it looks like | How to avoid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson's Paradox | Trend reverses when you segment | Always check by key dimensions | |
| Survivorship bias | Only analyzing current users | Include churned/failed in dataset | |
| Comparing unequal periods | Feb (28d) vs March (31d) | Normalize to per-day or same-length windows | |
| p-hacking | Testing until something is "significant" | Pre-register hypotheses or adjust for multiple comparisons | |
| Correlation in time series | Both went up = "related" | Check if controlling for time removes relationship | |
| Aggregating percentages | Averaging percentages directly | Re-calculate from underlying totals |
For detailed examples of each pitfall, see pitfalls.md.
Approach Selection
| Question type | Approach | Key output | |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Is X different from Y?" | Hypothesis test | p-value + effect size + CI | |
| "What predicts Z?" | Regression/correlation | Coefficients + R² + residual check | |
| "How do users behave over time?" | Cohort analysis | Retention curves by cohort | |
| "Are these groups different?" | Segmentation | Profiles + statistical comparison | |
| "What's unusual?" | Anomaly detection | Flagged points + context |
For technique details and when to use each, see techniques.md.
Output Standards
- Lead with the insight, not the methodology
- Quantify uncertainty — ranges, not point estimates
- State limitations — what this analysis can't tell you
- Recommend next steps — what would strengthen the conclusion
Red Flags to Escalate
- User wants to "prove" a predetermined conclusion
- Sample size too small for reliable inference
- Data quality issues that invalidate analysis
- Confounders that can't be controlled for
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/data-analysis/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Refreshed 3 Oct 2026, 21 days ago.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/pr-e/openclaw-master-skills/data-analysis)