qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/adult-eval
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
This benchmark evaluates income prediction models for fairness regarding demographic attributes like race and gender. It probes prediction stability under demographic perturbations (individual fairness) and measures equity in true positive rates across protected groups (group fairness). Use when the user wants to benchmark on Adult, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Balanced Accuracy (BA).
Install
npx vskill@latest install qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/adult-evalSKILL.md
adult-eval
SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual Fairness — Yurochkin et al. (2020) (arXiv:2006.14168, 2020)
What this evaluates
This benchmark evaluates income prediction models for fairness regarding demographic attributes like race and gender. It probes prediction stability under demographic perturbations (individual fairness) and measures equity in true positive rates across protected groups (group fairness).
Datasets
- Adult — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1); HF
uciml/adult
Metrics
Balanced Accuracy (BA)(primary) — range: [0, 1]- Average of sensitivity and specificity, used to handle class imbalance.
S-Con. (Spouse Consistency)— range: [0, 1]- Prediction consistency when marital status is perturbed.
GR-Con. (Gender/Race Consistency)— range: [0, 1]- Prediction consistency when gender and race are perturbed.
Gap_G^RMS— range: [0, 1]- RMS gap between true positive rates across genders.
Gap_R^RMS— range: [0, 1]- RMS gap between true positive rates across races.
Input / output format
Input: Tabular demographic and socioeconomic features (education, gender, race, marital status, hours worked, etc.).
Output: Binary income prediction (> $50k vs ≤ $50k).
Scoring recipe
Common pitfalls
- CLP baseline is excluded because counterfactuals are undefined for tabular data.
- Fair metric uses Mahalanobis distance with certain demographic dimensions projected out, which may affect consistency scores.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
To quantify group fairness they used RMS gaps and maximum gaps between true positive rates across genders (Gap_G^RMS and Gap_G^max) and races (Gap_R^RMS and Gap_R^max). Due to class imbalance, performance is quantified with balanced accuracy (B-Acc).
Citation
- arXiv: 2006.14168
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskill-factory/output/adult-eval/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 3
- Repository forks
- 1
- 7-day trend score
- 12
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/adult-eval)