qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/ai-quality

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Evaluates a feature-hierarchical edge inference framework's ability to dynamically allocate communication and computation resources to maximize AI quality under strict latency and energy constraints. Use when the user has predictions and gold and needs to compute AI quality (mAP).

Install

npx vskill@latest install qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/ai-quality

SKILL.md

ai-quality

Enabling AI Quality Control via Feature Hierarchical Edge Inference — Choi et al. (2022) (arXiv:2211.07860, 2022)

What this evaluates

Evaluates a feature-hierarchical edge inference framework's ability to dynamically allocate communication and computation resources to maximize AI quality under strict latency and energy constraints.

Datasets

  • YOLO v3 (unspecified dataset) — total ?; splits: test (-1)

Metrics

  • AI quality (mAP) (primary) — range: [0, 1]
  • Mean Average Precision (mAP) scaled by a feature size coefficient (δ_s = 12 mAP/Mbyte). The optimization objective maximizes the sum of AI quality across all mobiles.

Input / output format

Input: Raw input data (100 Kbytes), channel state information, and per-mobile computation/energy/latency constraints.

Output: Optimized uplink/downlink bandwidth allocation, edge/mobile computation FLOPS allocation, and selected feature scale, yielding a final AI quality score.

Scoring recipe

python
# Pseudo-code for the optimization objective
total_ai_quality = 0
for mobile in mobiles:
feature_size = select_feature_scale(mobile.channel_state)
ai_quality[mobile] = feature_size * delta_s # delta_s = 12 mAP/Mbyte
total_ai_quality += ai_quality[mobile]
# Constraints: avg_energy <= 5 J, avg_latency <= 15 sec
# Return allocation that maximizes total_ai_quality

Common pitfalls

  • The paper uses simulation parameters rather than a standard benchmark dataset; YOLO v3 is mentioned but the underlying dataset is not specified.
  • AI quality is a composite metric derived from mAP and feature size, not a direct classification accuracy score.
  • Benchmarks compare against simplified resource allocation strategies (constant quality, computation-only optimization) rather than modern edge inference frameworks.

Evidence (verbatim from paper)

We consider two benchmarks: constant AI quality and FHEI with computation resource optimization only. For the first benchmark, every mobile’s AI quality is fixed but optimized under the same constraints as the proposed FHEI... δ_s | Coefficient of quality function | 12 mAP/Mbyte

Citation

bibtex
@misc{choi2022enabling,
title={Enabling AI Quality Control via Feature Hierarchical Edge Inference},
author={Choi et al. (2022)},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2211.07860}
}
  • arXiv: 2211.07860

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
3
Repository forks
1
7-day trend score
12

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/ai-quality/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/ai-quality)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.