qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/aitw-eval
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Evaluates an agent's ability to infer and execute multi-step visual actions on Android devices from natural language instructions. It specifically probes Out-of-Distribution generalization across unseen Android OS versions, instruction language patterns (subjects/verbs), and app/web domains. Use when the user wants to benchmark on AITW, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports average score.
Install
npx vskill@latest install qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/aitw-evalSKILL.md
aitw-eval
Android in the Wild: A Large-Scale Dataset for Android Device Control — Rawles et al. (2023) (arXiv:2307.10088, 2023)
What this evaluates
Evaluates an agent's ability to infer and execute multi-step visual actions on Android devices from natural language instructions. It specifically probes Out-of-Distribution generalization across unseen Android OS versions, instruction language patterns (subjects/verbs), and app/web domains.
Datasets
- AITW — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1); repo https://github.com/google-research/google-research
Metrics
average score(primary) — range: percent- Percentage of successfully completed episodes. Evaluated separately for each dataset/task type, then averaged across all datasets to account for differing sizes.
Input / output format
Input: Natural language instruction and raw screen observations (UI screenshots) from an Android device.
Output: Sequence of device actions/gestures (e.g., taps, swipes, text input) to execute the requested task.
Scoring recipe
Common pitfalls
- Splitting by exact instruction match instead of using extracted subject/verb templates, which leaks similar language patterns into the test set.
- Mixing Android versions in the test split, violating the protocol that reserves Android 13 exclusively for testing.
- Averaging scores across datasets without evaluating each dataset separately first, as instructed due to differing dataset sizes.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We randomly split each dataset (the four multi-step datasets and SINGLE) episode wise into a training, validation, and test set $(80 / 10 / 10\%)$. Because the datasets different sizes, we evaluate each of them separately, then take the average score across them; we do the same for OOD setups.
Citation
- arXiv: 2307.10088
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskill-factory/output/aitw-eval/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 3
- Repository forks
- 1
- 7-day trend score
- 12
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/aitw-eval)