qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/anomaly-detection-eval
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Evaluates unsupervised and semi-supervised time series anomaly detection pipelines across multiple real-world and benchmark datasets. It measures how well different models identify known anomalous segments in telemetry, production traffic, and synthetic signals. Use when the user wants to benchmark on NAB, NASA, YAHOO, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports F1 score.
Install
npx vskill@latest install qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/anomaly-detection-evalSKILL.md
anomaly-detection-eval
Sintel: A Machine Learning Framework to Extract Insights from Signals — Alnegheimish et al. (2022) (arXiv:2204.09108, 2022)
What this evaluates
Evaluates unsupervised and semi-supervised time series anomaly detection pipelines across multiple real-world and benchmark datasets. It measures how well different models identify known anomalous segments in telemetry, production traffic, and synthetic signals.
Datasets
- NAB — total 45; splits: test (45); repo https://github.com/numenta/NAB
- NASA — total 80; splits: test (80); repo https://github.com/khundman/telemanom
- YAHOO — total 367; splits: test (367); repo https://webscope.sandbox.yahoo.com/catalog.php?datatype=s&did=70
Metrics
F1 score(primary) — range: [0, 1]- Calculated using an overlapping segment approach between predicted and ground-truth anomaly segments. Standard precision, recall, and F1 are reported per pipeline and dataset.
Input / output format
Input: Univariate or multivariate time series signals (e.g., spacecraft telemetry, server traffic metrics).
Output: Binary anomaly labels or detected anomaly segments for each time step/segment.
Scoring recipe
Common pitfalls
- No single pipeline dominates across all datasets; performance is highly dataset-dependent.
- High false positive rates can overwhelm human reviewers, making precision as critical as recall.
- Semi-supervised pipelines initially underperform unsupervised baselines until sufficient user annotations are accumulated.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Table [3]. Unsupervised anomaly detection results (F1 score, precision, and recall) per pipeline on each dataset.
Citation
- arXiv: 2204.09108
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskill-factory/output/anomaly-detection-eval/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 3
- Repository forks
- 1
- 7-day trend score
- 12
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool/anomaly-detection-eval)