raoofaltaher/ultrapowers/finishing-a-development-branch

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

Install

npx vskill@latest install raoofaltaher/ultrapowers/finishing-a-development-branch

SKILL.md

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Core principle: Verify tests → Verify the whole-ticket review → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

Step 1: Verify Tests

Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).

If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]

If tests pass: continue to Step 2.

Step 1b: Verify the Whole-Ticket Review

This step runs in the ticket form: .agents/ultrapowers.json exists at or above the working directory, the autopilot form does not apply, and the ticket id is known: from the conversation, else from the plan path plans/<ID>/, else from the branch name matched against the tasks/ folders (the id at the start of the branch name or after a separator). Outside it, continue to Step 2.

Read reviews/<ID>/TASK-REVIEW.md under the project root, the checkout that holds this branch. Its Repositories row names each branch and the head it was reviewed at; take the entry whose branch is this branch, or whose head matches when HEAD is detached. The report is current when that head is an ancestor of HEAD (git merge-base --is-ancestor <head> HEAD) and every commit since it touches only reviews/<ID>/ (git diff --name-only <head> HEAD lists nothing else).

StateDo
The file is missingRun ultrapowers:task-review <ID> from this workspace. The menu comes after its verdict, as it comes after a green suite.
The report is not currentThe verdict is stale: name the reviewed head and HEAD, then run ultrapowers:task-review <ID> again.
The report is currentThe whole-ticket review stands. Keep the Verdict: line and the Summary counts for Step 4.
task-review stopped before a verdict (NO-WORK, NO-CODE, an ERROR line)Keep its last message as the gate's result for Step 4.

The verdict informs the integration decision; it never makes it. Only your human partner's instruction to skip the gate, in so many words, skips it; then the menu message says the whole-ticket review was skipped at their request. A hurry, a demo, or "every task was reviewed" is not that instruction.

Step 2: Detect Environment

bash
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)

This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:

StateMenuCleanup
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo)Standard 3 optionsNo worktree to clean up
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branchStandard 3 optionsProvenance-based (see Step 6)
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEADReduced 2 options (no merge)Externally managed — leave in place

Step 3: Determine Base Branch

The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.

Step 4: Present Options

In the ticket form, the whole-ticket review's result comes first, above either menu, in two lines: the Verdict: line of reviews/<ID>/TASK-REVIEW.md and its finding counts, or task-review's last message when it stopped before a verdict. On FAIL or BLOCKED, the pull request option reads Push and create a draft Pull Request (option 2, or option 1 on a detached HEAD) and Option 2 below opens it as a draft. That wording swap is the only change the menus take.

Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?

Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:

Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).
1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?

Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.

Step 5: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally
bash
# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.

Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:

bash
git branch -d <feature-branch>
Option 2: Push and Create PR
bash
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote:
# git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>

Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.

In the ticket form the description quotes the Verdict: line of reviews/<ID>/TASK-REVIEW.md, or says that the whole-ticket review was skipped at your human partner's request. On a FAIL or BLOCKED verdict the pull request is a draft: gh pr create --draft, glab mr create --draft, or the forge's draft setting.

Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."

If your human partner asks to discard the work

This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:

bash
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:

bash
git branch -D <feature-branch>

Step 6: Cleanup Workspace

Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the GIT_DIR/GIT_COMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change.

If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.

If `WORKTREE_PATH` is under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`: Ultrapowers created this worktree — we own cleanup:

bash
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations

If removal is refused (contains modified or untracked files): the worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes, or scratch work. Never --force on your own initiative. Show your human partner what is at stake and ask:

bash
git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uall
Worktree removal refused — these files were never committed:
<file list>
1. Commit them to <branch> before cleanup
2. Move them into <main repo root>
3. Delete them (unrecoverable)
Which?

Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.

Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locallyyes--yes
2. Create PR-yesyes-
2. Create PR, verdict FAIL or BLOCKED-yes, as a draftyes-
3. Keep as-is--yes-
Discard (explicit request only)---yes (force)

Common Rationalizations

ExcuseReality
"Tests passed earlier this session"Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on.
"They obviously want it merged"Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait.
"They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it"The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words.
"'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation"Only the typed word discard authorizes deletion.
"The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now"PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands.
"This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too"Clean up only worktrees under .worktrees/ or worktrees/. Everything else belongs to the host.
"Removal refused — --force is just finishing the cleanup"The refusal means files exist only in that worktree. --force destroys them permanently. Show your human partner and ask.
"The merged-result failure is probably flaky"A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate.
"The base branch is obviously main"Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
"The push was rejected — force-push will fix it"A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request.
"Every task got a review, so the whole-ticket gate is done"Per-task reviews check the plan's work. task-review reads the whole ticket with its callers, runs the vulnerability hunt and the QA gate. Without its verdict, the gate did not run.
"They are in a hurry and QA takes an hour"A hurry is not an instruction to skip. task-review confirms its scope first; a deferral is your human partner's to say, in so many words.
"The verdict is FAIL, so I'll refuse to open the pull request"The verdict informs; your human partner decides. Show it above the menu; the pull request opens as a draft.
"The report exists, so the gate stands"A report for another head reviewed other code. Compare the head; a stale verdict means task-review runs again.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
1
7-day trend score
8

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/raoofaltaher/ultrapowers/finishing-a-development-branch/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/raoofaltaher/ultrapowers/finishing-a-development-branch)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.