raoofaltaher/ultrapowers/finishing-a-development-branch
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
Install
npx vskill@latest install raoofaltaher/ultrapowers/finishing-a-development-branchSKILL.md
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Core principle: Verify tests → Verify the whole-ticket review → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Step 1: Verify Tests
Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).
If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:
If tests pass: continue to Step 2.
Step 1b: Verify the Whole-Ticket Review
This step runs in the ticket form: .agents/ultrapowers.json exists at or above the working directory, the autopilot form does not apply, and the ticket id is known: from the conversation, else from the plan path plans/<ID>/, else from the branch name matched against the tasks/ folders (the id at the start of the branch name or after a separator). Outside it, continue to Step 2.
Read reviews/<ID>/TASK-REVIEW.md under the project root, the checkout that holds this branch. Its Repositories row names each branch and the head it was reviewed at; take the entry whose branch is this branch, or whose head matches when HEAD is detached. The report is current when that head is an ancestor of HEAD (git merge-base --is-ancestor <head> HEAD) and every commit since it touches only reviews/<ID>/ (git diff --name-only <head> HEAD lists nothing else).
| State | Do | |
|---|---|---|
| The file is missing | Run ultrapowers:task-review <ID> from this workspace. The menu comes after its verdict, as it comes after a green suite. | |
| The report is not current | The verdict is stale: name the reviewed head and HEAD, then run ultrapowers:task-review <ID> again. | |
| The report is current | The whole-ticket review stands. Keep the Verdict: line and the Summary counts for Step 4. | |
task-review stopped before a verdict (NO-WORK, NO-CODE, an ERROR line) | Keep its last message as the gate's result for Step 4. |
The verdict informs the integration decision; it never makes it. Only your human partner's instruction to skip the gate, in so many words, skips it; then the menu message says the whole-ticket review was skipped at their request. A hurry, a demo, or "every task was reviewed" is not that instruction.
Step 2: Detect Environment
This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
| State | Menu | Cleanup | |
|---|---|---|---|
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo) | Standard 3 options | No worktree to clean up | |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branch | Standard 3 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) | |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEAD | Reduced 2 options (no merge) | Externally managed — leave in place |
Step 3: Determine Base Branch
The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
Step 4: Present Options
In the ticket form, the whole-ticket review's result comes first, above either menu, in two lines: the Verdict: line of reviews/<ID>/TASK-REVIEW.md and its finding counts, or task-review's last message when it stopped before a verdict. On FAIL or BLOCKED, the pull request option reads Push and create a draft Pull Request (option 2, or option 1 on a detached HEAD) and Option 2 below opens it as a draft. That wording swap is the only change the menus take.
Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:
Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:
Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.
Step 5: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.
Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:
Option 2: Push and Create PR
Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.
In the ticket form the description quotes the Verdict: line of reviews/<ID>/TASK-REVIEW.md, or says that the whole-ticket review was skipped at your human partner's request. On a FAIL or BLOCKED verdict the pull request is a draft: gh pr create --draft, glab mr create --draft, or the forge's draft setting.
Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."
If your human partner asks to discard the work
This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:
Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:
Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:
Step 6: Cleanup Workspace
Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the GIT_DIR/GIT_COMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change.
If `GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON`: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
If `WORKTREE_PATH` is under `.worktrees/` or `worktrees/`: Ultrapowers created this worktree — we own cleanup:
If removal is refused (contains modified or untracked files): the worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes, or scratch work. Never --force on your own initiative. Show your human partner what is at stake and ask:
Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.
Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.
Quick Reference
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge locally | yes | - | - | yes | |
| 2. Create PR | - | yes | yes | - | |
| 2. Create PR, verdict FAIL or BLOCKED | - | yes, as a draft | yes | - | |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | yes | - | |
| Discard (explicit request only) | - | - | - | yes (force) |
Common Rationalizations
| Excuse | Reality | |
|---|---|---|
| "Tests passed earlier this session" | Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on. | |
| "They obviously want it merged" | Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait. | |
| "They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it" | The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words. | |
| "'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation" | Only the typed word discard authorizes deletion. | |
| "The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now" | PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands. | |
| "This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too" | Clean up only worktrees under .worktrees/ or worktrees/. Everything else belongs to the host. | |
"Removal refused — --force is just finishing the cleanup" | The refusal means files exist only in that worktree. --force destroys them permanently. Show your human partner and ask. | |
| "The merged-result failure is probably flaky" | A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate. | |
| "The base branch is obviously main" | Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo. | |
| "The push was rejected — force-push will fix it" | A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request. | |
| "Every task got a review, so the whole-ticket gate is done" | Per-task reviews check the plan's work. task-review reads the whole ticket with its callers, runs the vulnerability hunt and the QA gate. Without its verdict, the gate did not run. | |
| "They are in a hurry and QA takes an hour" | A hurry is not an instruction to skip. task-review confirms its scope first; a deferral is your human partner's to say, in so many words. | |
| "The verdict is FAIL, so I'll refuse to open the pull request" | The verdict informs; your human partner decides. Show it above the menu; the pull request opens as a draft. | |
| "The report exists, so the gate stands" | A report for another head reviewed other code. Compare the head; a stale verdict means task-review runs again. |
Security
- Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 1
- 7-day trend score
- 8
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/raoofaltaher/ultrapowers/finishing-a-development-branch)