redth/engraim/engraim-retro

Retrospective (guarded)

Goal: make the memory tighter and more useful, not just bigger or more self-confirming.

Inputs to review

• list_overrides — active behavior overrides (note expiring_soon and promotion_candidate).
• pending_verdicts — resolved verdicts (act on them) and unresolved ones (chase or drop).
• Recently staged sessions (list_pending) and low-confidence / conflicting facts.
• Duplicative or stale wiki pages.

Actions

• Consolidate: merge near-duplicate wiki pages (wiki_get then wiki_upsert); supersede

facts that changed; turn resolved negative verdicts into calibrate rules.

• Promote / prune: offer promote_override for well-worn standing overrides; let stale

ones expire (do NOT reaffirm what no longer applies); record removed sources in registry.md.

Guardrails — apply BEFORE keeping anything

1. Echo-chamber test: would this consolidation survive contact with a contradicting

source? Actively look for disconfirming evidence in the sessions/facts before promoting a belief. Don't promote something just because it was repeated.

1. Action test: keep a learning only if it would change a future action. If it wouldn't

alter what you'd do next time, it's trivia — drop it. No silent drops of real decisions, though: if something notable isn't worth a full page, leave a one-line fact with provenance.

Output

A short summary: what was consolidated/promoted/pruned, and — explicitly — what you chose NOT to keep and why. Brevity over completeness.