reggiechan74/021-cre-150/roof-score-matrix

Roof Score Matrix

You are producing the cross-bid scoring matrix after the qualification-check and technical-review skills have populated sub-scores and gate results. This skill is deterministic — it delegates the math to scripts/score.py.

Reference Material

• fixtures/domain_knowledge/03_tender_evaluation_methodology.md §3 — MCDA weighting patterns, price scoring formulas, 5-point rubric anchors

Procedure

1. Verify preconditions. The manifest must have:

• rfp.evaluation_criteria.weighting populated
• Each bid has mandatory_gates populated (from qualification-check)
• Each bid has rated sub-scores on scores.technical_approach, scores.warranty_materials, scores.experience_references, scores.qualifications_certifications, scores.schedule
• Each bid has pricing.base_bid_cad

If any missing, run the upstream skill or stop and tell the user what's missing.

1. Invoke the scoring engine. If the user supplied an evaluation_config.yaml (via config=<path> argument to the command), pass it with --config:

python3 "$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/score.py" --manifest <tender_manifest.json> [--config <evaluation_config.yaml>]

Config overrides the RFP's weighting and/or price_scoring_method — useful when the owner wants to reweight for project type (occupied, heritage, BPS) without editing the parsed RFP. The engine validates that weights sum to 100 and records the source in manifest.rfp.evaluation_criteria.weighting_source for audit.

This:

• Computes price sub-score via the configured method (default: (lowest/this) × 100)
• Combines with rated sub-scores via weighted sum
• Ranks compliant bidders
• Writes comparison.price_low_cad, price_high_cad, price_spread_percent, compliant_bidders_count, recommended_bidder_id back to the manifest

1. Produce scoring rationale. For each ranked bid, write to bid.scoring_rationale:

• strengths: top 2-3 sub-scores with brief justification
• weaknesses: weakest 1-2 sub-scores with brief justification
• differentiator: the single factor that most separates this bid from its neighbour in the ranking

1. Render the matrix. Prefer the deterministic path:

python3 "$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/render_matrix.py" \
  --manifest <tender_manifest.json> \
  --out <manifest-dir>/../scoring_matrix.md

If scoring_matrix.md already exists (the /roof-review command typically produces it in step 5), read it and refine only if the mechanical output reads awkwardly. Do not regenerate from scratch. Leave numbers and structure alone — they are authoritative. Only touch rationale prose if the pulled scoring_rationale text reads poorly.

Weighting Integrity Check

Before running the engine, verify sum(weighting.values()) == 100. If not, raise an error and tell the user which criterion to adjust.

Price Spread Warning

If price_spread_percent > 15, flag to the owner in the matrix rendering that:

Scope divergence or low-bid risk is likely. Recommend reviewing the red flag report cross-bid section before award.

(Per fixture 03 §4 — 15% threshold is the CCA industry heuristic for bid outliers.)

Output

• Updated tender manifest (in place)
• scoring_matrix.md rendered from template

Summary to User

• Rank order with weighted totals
• Price spread %
• Winner's margin over #2
• Any weighting adjustments applied or integrity warnings raised