ricmmartins/azure-sre-agent-skills/01-well-architected-review
Claude Code and agent skill by ricmmartins/azure-sre-agent-skills
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Run a Well-Architected Framework (WAF) review against Azure resources in scope. Use when asked about best practices, architecture review, WAF assessment, or pillar compliance (Reliability, Security, Cost, Operational Excellence, Performance Efficiency).
Install
npx vskill@latest install ricmmartins/azure-sre-agent-skills/01-well-architected-reviewSKILL.md
Well-Architected Review
Purpose
Perform a structured assessment of Azure resources against the five pillars of the Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework. Produce a scored report with prioritized recommendations.
When to use this skill
- User asks "are we following best practices?"
- User asks for a WAF or Well-Architected review
- User wants to assess architecture quality before a launch or audit
- Periodic (quarterly) architecture health check
Pillars and checks
1. Reliability
Run the following checks and report findings:
- Availability design: Check if critical workloads use availability zones or availability sets
``bash az vm list --query "[].{name:name, zones:zones, availabilitySet:availabilitySet.id}" -o table az appservice plan list --query "[].{name:name, zoneRedundant:zoneRedundant, sku:sku.name}" -o table ``
- Backup coverage: Verify Recovery Services vaults and backup policies exist for VMs, databases, and file shares
``bash az backup vault list -o table ` Then for each vault: `bash az backup item list --vault-name <vault> --resource-group <rg> --backup-management-type AzureIaasVM -o table ``
- Disaster recovery: Check for paired regions, ASR replication, or geo-redundant storage
- Health probes: Verify App Service health checks, load balancer probes, and Container Apps health endpoints
- Auto-healing: Check if App Service auto-heal rules or AKS pod disruption budgets are configured
2. Security
- Identity: Check for managed identities vs. stored credentials
``bash az webapp identity show --name <app> --resource-group <rg> az ad app list --query "[].{name:displayName, passwordCredentials:passwordCredentials}" -o table ``
- Network isolation: Check for private endpoints, NSGs, and service endpoints
``bash az network private-endpoint list -o table az network nsg list -o table ``
- Encryption: Verify encryption at rest (storage, databases) and in transit (TLS)
- Key management: Check Key Vault usage and key/secret expiration dates
``bash az keyvault list -o table az keyvault secret list --vault-name <vault> --query "[].{name:name, expires:attributes.expires}" -o table ``
- Defender for Cloud: Check Secure Score and outstanding recommendations
3. Cost Optimization
- Rightsizing: Identify underutilized VMs (CPU < 5% average over 14 days)
- Orphaned resources: Find unattached disks, unused public IPs, empty resource groups
``bash az disk list --query "[?managedBy==null].{name:name, size:diskSizeGb, rg:resourceGroup}" -o table az network public-ip list --query "[?ipConfiguration==null].{name:name, rg:resourceGroup}" -o table ``
- Reservations: Check if high-usage resources could benefit from reserved instances
- Dev/Test pricing: Verify non-production workloads use Dev/Test subscriptions or B-series VMs
- Storage tiers: Check if cool/archive tiers are used for infrequently accessed data
4. Operational Excellence
- IaC coverage: Check for ARM/Bicep/Terraform templates in connected repos
- Tagging: Verify mandatory tags (environment, owner, cost-center) exist
``bash az resource list --query "[?tags.environment==null].{name:name, type:type, rg:resourceGroup}" -o table ``
- Monitoring: Check for alert rules, action groups, and diagnostic settings
``bash az monitor metrics alert list -o table az monitor diagnostic-settings list --resource <id> -o table ``
- Deployment practices: Check for deployment slots, blue-green, or canary configurations
- Automation: Check for runbooks, Logic Apps, or scheduled tasks for routine operations
5. Performance Efficiency
- Autoscaling: Verify autoscale rules exist for App Service plans, VMSS, and Container Apps
``bash az monitor autoscale list --resource-group <rg> -o table ` Note: az monitor autoscale list requires --resource-group. Iterate over relevant resource groups, or use Azure Resource Graph: `bash az graph query -q "resources | where type == 'microsoft.insights/autoscalesettings'" -o table ``
- Caching: Check for Redis Cache or CDN usage on high-traffic workloads
- Database performance: Check DTU/vCore utilization, index recommendations
- Content delivery: Verify static assets use CDN or Front Door
- Connection pooling: Check for connection string patterns suggesting missing pooling
Scoring model
For each check, assign one of:
- ✅ Pass — follows best practice
- ⚠️ Needs attention — partially implemented or at risk
- ❌ Fail — not implemented, risk exposure
Accepted exceptions (optional)
If the user provides a list of accepted exceptions, do not flag those items. Instead, note them in the report as Accepted Exception with the reason provided.
Example format the user may provide:
| Check | Reason | |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Availability zones | Single-AZ by design to reduce cost | |
| 3.3 Reserved instances | Short-term workload, reservations not applicable | |
| 5.5 Connection pooling | Legacy app uses persistent connections by design |
When exceptions are provided:
- Skip the flagged checks in scoring
- List them in a separate "Accepted Exceptions" section at the end of the report
- Recalculate the overall score excluding excepted checks
Expected output
Report header (mandatory — use this exact format)
Well-Architected Review Report
| Field | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Subscription | (name + ID) | |
| Assessment Date | YYYY-MM-DD | |
| Overall Score | XX% |
Summary
A table with pillar scores:
| Pillar | Pass | Needs Attention | Fail | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | X | Y | Z | X/(X+Y+Z) % | |
| Security | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
| Cost Optimization | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
| Operational Excellence | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
| Performance Efficiency | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
| Overall | avg % |
Detailed findings
For each pillar, list every check with:
- Status (pass/attention/fail)
- Evidence (command output or observation)
- Recommendation (specific action to take)
- Priority (Critical / High / Medium / Low)
- Reference link to WAF documentation
Top 5 recommendations
Ordered by impact, with estimated effort (hours/days) for each.
Remediation guidance
For each ❌ or ⚠️ finding, include in the output:
- The specific
azCLI command to remediate (suggest only — do not execute) - Use
GetAzCliHelpto validate the command syntax before suggesting - The official Microsoft Learn documentation link for the remediation
References
- WAF Overview: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/
- Reliability: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/reliability/
- Security: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/security/
- Cost Optimization: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/cost-optimization/
- Operational Excellence: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/operational-excellence/
- Performance Efficiency: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/performance-efficiency/
Sample output
The following is a redacted example of what the report looks like when run against a subscription.
Well-Architected Review Report
| Field | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Subscription | contoso-prod-001 (a1b2c3d4-e5f6-7890-abcd-ef1234567890) | |
| Assessment Date | 2026-07-15 | |
| Overall Score | 68% |
Summary
| Pillar | Pass | Needs Attention | Fail | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60% | |
| Security | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40% | |
| Cost Optimization | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80% | |
| Operational Excellence | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60% | |
| Performance Efficiency | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80% | |
| Overall | 16 | 5 | 4 | 68% |
Detailed findings (sample)
Reliability
| Check | Status | Evidence | Priority | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Availability zones | ❌ Fail | VMs vm-web-01, vm-web-02 in rg-app-prod have no zones configured | Critical | |
| 1.2 Backup coverage | ✅ Pass | Recovery Services vault rsv-prod-eastus protects 4/4 VMs | — | |
| 1.3 Disaster recovery | ⚠️ Needs attention | No ASR replication configured for rg-app-prod | High |
Security
| Check | Status | Evidence | Priority | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 Managed identity | ✅ Pass | App Service app-api-prod uses System-Assigned MI | — | |
| 2.2 Network isolation | ❌ Fail | SQL Server sql-contoso-prod has public endpoint enabled | Critical | |
| 2.3 Key management | ⚠️ Needs attention | 2 secrets in kv-contoso-prod expire within 30 days | High |
Top 5 recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Effort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enable availability zones on production VMs | Critical | 2 hours | |
| 2 | Disable public endpoint on SQL Server | Critical | 30 min | |
| 3 | Configure ASR replication for rg-app-prod | High | 4 hours | |
| 4 | Rotate expiring Key Vault secrets | High | 1 hour | |
| 5 | Add autoscale rules to App Service plan asp-prod | Medium | 30 min |
Remediation guidance (sample)
Security
- Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/01-well-architected-review/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 70
- Repository forks
- 13
- 7-day trend score
- 21
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/ricmmartins/azure-sre-agent-skills/01-well-architected-review)