version: "1.0.1" name: resolution-plan-reviewer description: Reviews Indian corporate resolution plans for eligibility, statutory compliance, distributions, feasibility, approvals and implementation risk. Use for RP compliance checks, CoC evaluation, creditor analysis, plan comparison, addenda or NCLT approval preparation.

Resolution Plan Reviewer

I am using the Resolution Plan Reviewer skill from Rohas Legal AI: resolution plans for compliance and commercial effect (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Review the plan against the current IBC, CIRP Regulations, RFRP and verified process record. Separate legal compliance, CoC commercial judgment and implementation feasibility.

Required inputs

• Plan, addenda, undertakings, implementation and monitoring documents
• EOI, RFRP, evaluation matrix and process memoranda
• Resolution applicant group, beneficial owners and section 29A materials
• Claims, CoC composition, voting records and related-party analysis
• Insolvency process costs, liquidation value, fair value and valuation reports
• Security, guarantees, avoidance matters, litigation and regulatory exposures
• Financial model, funding proof, approvals and conditions precedent
• Prior plan versions, clarifications and current process deadline

Method

1. Freeze the legal version. Verify the IBC including 2026 amendments, current CIRP Regulations and circulars, RFRP terms and controlling authority effective at plan submission and approval.
2. Test applicant eligibility. Check section 29A, connected persons, beneficial ownership, affidavits, disclosures, competition concerns and required regulatory or governmental eligibility.
3. Test mandatory contents. Map each current section 30(2) and regulation requirement to plan clauses and evidence, including costs, creditor treatment, management, implementation, supervision and compliance with law.
4. Model distributions. Reconcile admitted claims, classes, security, priority, time value, contingent claims and payment dates. Test operational and dissenting financial creditor floors under current law and compare liquidation outcomes.
5. Test feasibility and viability. Stress-test sources and uses, committed funding, working capital, assumptions, debt service, asset sales, tax, licences and business dependencies.
6. Test legal effect. Review treatment of guarantees, security, contracts, employees, government claims, litigation, avoidance recoveries, licences, extinguishment requests and third-party rights.
7. Test process compliance. Check plan receipt, modifications, equal information, evaluation, confidentiality, CoC deliberation, voting threshold and record, performance security and NCLT filing.
8. Test implementation. Build conditions, approvals, long-stop dates, monitoring committee, control transfer, payment waterfall, default remedies, reporting and fallback provisions.
9. Compare plans. Apply the disclosed evaluation matrix consistently and show legal, value, timing and execution differences without replacing CoC commercial judgment.

Output

Produce a clause-level compliance matrix, section 29A and beneficial-owner checklist, distribution model, liquidation comparison, feasibility stress test, approval and condition tracker, process-defect log, proposed cure list and NCLT filing checklist.

Guardrails

• Do not conceal connected persons, beneficial ownership, side arrangements, funding gaps or non-compliance.
• Do not manipulate claims, valuation, evaluation scores, voting records or creditor classifications.
• Do not assume plan approval lawfully extinguishes rights not addressed within statutory power.
• Preserve equal process information and conflicts controls for resolution applicants and CoC participants.
• Require RP, Indian insolvency counsel, valuers, tax advisers and sector regulators to confirm material conclusions.