sanjay3290/ai-skills/grok-build

Grok Build Orchestration

The coding assistant is the orchestrator: it plans, writes self-contained task specs, dispatches them to Grok Build headlessly, reviews every diff, and owns the final result. Grok is the fast, cheap executor. Full CLI details and verified behaviors: references/cli.md.

When to delegate vs keep with the orchestrator

When in doubt, keep it with the orchestrator.

Session preflight (once, before the first dispatch)

1. grok update --check --json — if updateAvailable is true, run grok update and

confirm with grok --version.

1. grok models — if it errors or reports logged out, STOP and ask the user to run

grok login.

Per-task loop (sequential — the default)

1. Spec. Write a self-contained task file (template below) to a temp directory

OUTSIDE the target repo — the harness scratchpad if one is available, else the OS temp dir. Never write it inside the target repo. Grok has zero conversation context: no one-liner prompts, ever.

• POSIX: mkdir -p "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/grok-specs", then write task.md there.
• Windows (PowerShell): New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$env:TEMP\grok-specs",

then write task.md there.

1. Clean state. No uncommitted source changes — commit or stash first, so the

post-run diff is exactly Grok's work. Ignore build artifacts (__pycache__, dist/, etc.); if they show in git status, they're usually just un-gitignored, not your concern. Never dispatch on a dirty source tree.

1. Dispatch.

POSIX:

``bash grok --prompt-file <task-file> \ --output-format json \ --always-approve \ --max-turns 30 \ --cwd <repo> ``

Windows (PowerShell) — backtick line-continuation:

``powershell grok --prompt-file <task-file> --output-format json --always-approve --max-turns 30 --cwd <repo> ``

Parse the JSON output and save sessionId. (--always-approve is required for headless runs — --permission-mode acceptEdits silently cancels edits with no interactive approver. See references/cli.md.) For a high-stakes task, add --check so Grok self-verifies before you review; skip it otherwise (it ~doubles latency).

1. Review gate — non-negotiable.

• Read the diff yourself (git diff -- <files from the spec> to skip artifact noise):

does it do the task, only the task, and match repo conventions?

• Run the acceptance commands from the spec.
• Pass → commit with a clear message following the repo's convention → next task.
• Fail → fix-up: `grok --resume <sessionId> -p "<specific feedback>"

--always-approve --output-format json. **Max 2 fix-up rounds.** Still failing → revert Grok's changes (git checkout -- .; git clean -fd` for new files), do the task yourself, and tell the user Grok couldn't complete it.

Task spec template

# Task: <one-line title>
 
## Context
-Repo: <path> — <one line on what the project is>
-Conventions: <test runner, formatter, a good example file to imitate>
 
## Files
-Modify: <path>
-Create: <path>
 
## Task
<precise description of the change>
 
## Constraints
-Do not modify any files other than those listed above.
-<other constraints>
 
## Acceptance criteria
-`<exact command>` <expected result>

Executing a Markdown implementation plan

• One plan task per dispatch, in order.
• Check off the plan's task checkboxes (- [ ] → - [x]) as each task lands and passes

the review gate.

• If the plan explicitly marks tasks as independent, see Parallel dispatch below;

otherwise stay sequential.

Parallel dispatch (opt-in exception, not the default)

Only when a plan explicitly marks tasks independent: dispatch each with --worktree=<task-slug>, run concurrently, then review and merge one worktree at a time through the same review gate. Merge conflicts usually eat the savings — prefer sequential.

Failure handling

Models

Default grok-4.5. Add -m grok-composer-2.5-fast only for trivial mechanical tasks.