santosomar/ethical-hacking-agent-skills/pt-scanning

Pen Test Scanning

Authorized Use Only

Run scans only against approved in-scope targets and within agreed timing/rate constraints. If scan aggressiveness is unknown, default to conservative settings and ask.

Objectives

1. Characterize reachable hosts, ports, services, and tech stack.
2. Identify likely vulnerabilities with low false positives.
3. Prioritize findings for manual validation in later phases.

Workflow

1. Prepare scan plan:

• Inputs: recon asset list, scope, constraints
• Segment scans by asset class (web, API, infra, device)

1. Run discovery and service profiling:

• Host/port/service enumeration with safe rate limits
• Capture versions and configuration indicators

1. Perform vulnerability scanning:

• Focus on known CVEs, weak configs, and exposed management interfaces
• Record scanner confidence and evidence, not just severity labels

1. Application-focused scanning:

• Static review when source or binaries are available
• Dynamic analysis for runtime behavior and attack surface

1. Triage results:

• Remove duplicates
• Flag likely false positives for manual verification
• Rank by exploitability and business impact

Output Template

# Scanning Output
 
## Scan Coverage
-Target groups:
-Methods used:
-Time window:
 
## Findings (Prioritized)
-Finding:
  -Affected asset:
  -Evidence:
  -Confidence:
  -Exploitability notes:
  -Recommended validation:
 
## False Positive Queue
-Candidate:
  -Why uncertain:
  -Verification step:
 
## Handoff to Gaining Access
-High-priority validated candidates:
-Preconditions:

Quality Checks

• Coverage is mapped to scope; gaps are documented.
• Every finding includes evidence and confidence.
• Results are deduplicated and prioritized for manual testing.