<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
security-phoenix-demo/security-skills-claude-code/phoenix-final-gate
──Details
PublishedSeptember 30, 2026 at 08:18 AM
Content Hashsha256:73460c7d2bc8176f...
Git SHA40ace4aa7101
──Files
Files (1 file, 3.4 KB)
SKILL.md3.4 KBactive
SKILL.md · 106 lines · 3.4 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: phoenix-final-gate description: > Role 10 of the Phoenix Security spec pipeline. Makes the final SHIP / NO_SHIP decision for a Phoenix Security feature spec by checking 8 hard blockers: critical ambiguities remaining, unverified MUSTs, multi-tenant isolation gaps (PSC-03), auth layer coverage (PSC-06), AI agent safety violations (PSC-08), scope creep vs SCOPE_DEFINITION, P0 security not in Batch 1, and active enterprise account requirements (Mimecast, Johnson Matthey, Anaplan) not covered at P0. On SHIP, triggers Confluence push + optional Linear/Slack/Asana/email. On NO_SHIP, lists blockers with source role and required fix. Use this skill for final quality review, when someone says "is this ready to build", "final gate", "ship or no-ship", "is the spec done", or "review the full spec". Can be re-run after fixing blockers.


Phoenix Security — Final Gate Reviewer (Role 10)

Token Budget: ≤800 tokens Depends On: All previous roles (01–09) Feeds Into: FEATURE_SPEC.md + Confluence push (if SHIP) Output: 10-final-gate.md


Hard Blockers (any = NO_SHIP)

Run this checklist explicitly — do not skip any item:

  • [ ] Critical ambiguities remaining (Role 05) > 0
  • [ ] Any MUST lacks proof path (Role 08, unverified_musts > 0 without downgrade rationale)
  • [ ] PSC-03 multi-tenancy not addressed in security requirements
  • [ ] PSC-06 auth layer not addressed for any new endpoint
  • [ ] PSC-08 AI agent autonomous action not gated (if LLM in scope)
  • [ ] Scope creep: requirements outside SCOPE_DEFINITION from Role 02
  • [ ] P0 security requirements NOT in Batch 1 (Role 09)
  • [ ] Active enterprise account requirements (Mimecast/JM/Anaplan) not covered at P0

Soft Warnings (flag, do not block)

  • Manual-only proof paths for non-security requirements
  • Missing success metrics vs Phoenix case study benchmarks
  • Batch count implies >4 weeks without CTO sign-off
  • Regulatory hooks not documented
  • Competitor brand names in user-facing copy

Output Schema

markdown
---
meta:
role: 10-final-gate
session_id: session-[YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS]
token_count: [actual]
decision: SHIP | NO_SHIP
blocker_count: [N]
status: complete
---
### FINAL_GATE
#### DECISION
SHIP | NO_SHIP
#### HARD_BLOCKER_CHECK
-PSC-03 multi-tenancy: addressed | missing
-PSC-06 auth: addressed | missing
-PSC-08 AI agent: addressed | N/A
-Critical ambiguities: [count]
-Unverified MUSTs: [count]
-Scope creep: detected | none
-P0 in Batch 1: yes | no
-Enterprise account coverage: complete | gaps → [list gaps]
#### BLOCKERS (max 10; NO_SHIP only)
-B1: <gap> → source role: 0N → fix required: <exact action>
#### NON_BLOCKING_IMPROVEMENTS (max 10)
-N1: ...
#### NEXT_ACTIONS (ordered; owner + ETA)
1.[@owner] <action> — <ETA>

Post-Gate Actions

On SHIP:

  1. Save 10-final-gate.md
  2. Compile FEATURE_SPEC.md (Phoenix PRD template)
  3. Push to Confluence SPM space (Atlassian MCP — mandatory; fallback parent: 1273987073)
  4. Ask once: "Want me to create Linear/Asana tickets, notify Slack, or email stakeholders?"
  5. Status: ✅ Pipeline complete

On NO_SHIP:

  1. Save 10-final-gate.md
  2. Mark PRD status: BLOCKED
  3. Produce all output files regardless — partial spec beats no artefact
  4. Fix each blocker at source role → re-run downstream → return here

Chaining

Save: outputs/{session-id}/10-final-gate.md → If SHIP: compile FEATURE_SPEC.md using phoenix-prd-generator template

All versions