sekolah76/syadagentic/guidelines-advisor

Claude Code and agent skill by sekolah76/syadagentic

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Smart contract development advisor based on Trail of Bits' best practices. Analyzes codebase to generate documentation/specifications, review architecture, check upgradeability patterns, assess implementation quality, identify pitfalls, review dependencies, and evaluate testing. Provides actionable recommendations.

Install

npx vskill@latest install sekolah76/syadagentic/guidelines-advisor

SKILL.md

The same SKILL.md was published earlier as appleweiping/agent_resource/guidelines-advisor.

Guidelines Advisor

Purpose

Systematically analyzes the codebase and provides guidance based on Trail of Bits' development guidelines:

  1. Generate documentation and specifications (plain English descriptions, architectural diagrams, code documentation)
  2. Optimize on-chain/off-chain architecture (only if applicable)
  3. Review upgradeability patterns (if your project has upgrades)
  4. Check delegatecall/proxy implementations (if present)
  5. Assess implementation quality (functions, inheritance, events)
  6. Identify common pitfalls
  7. Review dependencies
  8. Evaluate test suite and suggest improvements

Framework: Building Secure Contracts - Development Guidelines


How This Works

Phase 1: Discovery & Context

Explores the codebase to understand:

  • Project structure and platform
  • Contract/module files and their purposes
  • Existing documentation
  • Architecture patterns (proxies, upgrades, etc.)
  • Testing setup
  • Dependencies
Phase 2: Documentation Generation

Helps create:

  • Plain English system description
  • Architectural diagrams (using Slither printers for Solidity)
  • Code documentation recommendations (NatSpec for Solidity)
Phase 3: Architecture Analysis

Analyzes:

  • On-chain vs off-chain component distribution (if applicable)
  • Upgradeability approach (if applicable)
  • Delegatecall proxy patterns (if present)
Phase 4: Implementation Review

Assesses:

  • Function composition and clarity
  • Inheritance structure
  • Event logging practices
  • Common pitfalls presence
  • Dependencies quality
  • Testing coverage and techniques
Phase 5: Recommendations

Provides:

  • Prioritized improvement suggestions
  • Best practice guidance
  • Actionable next steps

Assessment Areas

I analyze 11 comprehensive areas covering all aspects of smart contract development. For detailed criteria, best practices, and specific checks, see ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md.

Quick Reference:
  1. Documentation & Specifications
  • Plain English system descriptions
  • Architectural diagrams
  • NatSpec completeness (Solidity)
  • Documentation gaps identification
  1. On-Chain vs Off-Chain Computation
  • Complexity analysis
  • Gas optimization opportunities
  • Verification vs computation patterns
  1. Upgradeability
  • Migration vs upgradeability trade-offs
  • Data separation patterns
  • Upgrade procedure documentation
  1. Delegatecall Proxy Pattern
  • Storage layout consistency
  • Initialization patterns
  • Function shadowing risks
  • Slither upgradeability checks
  1. Function Composition
  • Function size and clarity
  • Logical grouping
  • Modularity assessment
  1. Inheritance
  • Hierarchy depth/width
  • Diamond problem risks
  • Inheritance visualization
  1. Events
  • Critical operation coverage
  • Event naming consistency
  • Indexed parameters
  1. Common Pitfalls
  • Reentrancy patterns
  • Integer overflow/underflow
  • Access control issues
  • Platform-specific vulnerabilities
  1. Dependencies
  • Library quality assessment
  • Version management
  • Dependency manager usage
  • Copied code detection
  1. Testing & Verification
  • Coverage analysis
  • Fuzzing techniques
  • Formal verification
  • CI/CD integration
  1. Platform-Specific Guidance
  • Solidity version recommendations
  • Compiler warning checks
  • Inline assembly warnings
  • Platform-specific tools

For complete details on each area including what I'll check, analyze, and recommend, see ASSESSMENT_AREAS.md.


Example Output

When the analysis is complete, you'll receive comprehensive guidance covering:

  • System documentation with plain English descriptions
  • Architectural diagrams and documentation gaps
  • Architecture analysis (on-chain/off-chain, upgradeability, proxies)
  • Implementation review (functions, inheritance, events, pitfalls)
  • Dependencies and testing evaluation
  • Prioritized recommendations (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW)
  • Overall assessment and path to production

For a complete example analysis report, see EXAMPLE_REPORT.md.


Deliverables

I provide four comprehensive deliverable categories:

1. System Documentation
  • Plain English descriptions
  • Architectural diagrams
  • Documentation gaps analysis
2. Architecture Analysis
  • On-chain/off-chain assessment
  • Upgradeability review
  • Proxy pattern security review
3. Implementation Review
  • Function composition analysis
  • Inheritance assessment
  • Events coverage
  • Pitfall identification
  • Dependencies evaluation
  • Testing analysis
4. Prioritized Recommendations
  • CRITICAL (address immediately)
  • HIGH (address before deployment)
  • MEDIUM (address for production quality)
  • LOW (nice to have)

For detailed templates and examples of each deliverable, see DELIVERABLES.md.


Assessment Process

When invoked, I will:

  1. Explore the codebase
  • Identify all contract/module files
  • Find existing documentation
  • Locate test files
  • Check for proxies/upgrades
  • Identify dependencies
  1. Generate documentation
  • Create plain English system description
  • Generate architectural diagrams (if tools available)
  • Identify documentation gaps
  1. Analyze architecture
  • Assess on-chain/off-chain distribution (if applicable)
  • Review upgradeability approach (if applicable)
  • Audit proxy patterns (if present)
  1. Review implementation
  • Analyze functions, inheritance, events
  • Check for common pitfalls
  • Assess dependencies
  • Evaluate testing
  1. Provide recommendations
  • Present findings with file references
  • Ask clarifying questions about design decisions
  • Suggest prioritized improvements
  • Offer actionable next steps

Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)

RationalizationWhy It's WrongRequired Action
"System is simple, description covers everything"Plain English descriptions miss security-critical detailsComplete all 5 phases: documentation, architecture, implementation, dependencies, recommendations
"No upgrades detected, skip upgradeability section"Upgradeability can be implicit (ownable patterns, delegatecall)Search for proxy patterns, delegatecall, storage collisions before declaring N/A
"Not applicable" without verificationPremature scope reduction misses vulnerabilitiesVerify with explicit codebase search before skipping any guideline section
"Architecture is straightforward, no analysis needed"Obvious architectures have subtle trust boundariesAnalyze on-chain/off-chain distribution, access control flow, external dependencies
"Common pitfalls don't apply to this codebase"Every codebase has common pitfallsSystematically check all guideline pitfalls with grep/code search
"Tests exist, testing guideline is satisfied"Test existence ≠ test qualityCheck coverage, property-based tests, integration tests, failure cases
"I can provide generic best practices"Generic advice isn't actionableProvide project-specific findings with file:line references
"User knows what to improve from findings"Findings without prioritization = no action planGenerate prioritized improvement roadmap with specific next steps

Notes

  • I'll only analyze relevant sections (won't hallucinate about upgrades if not present)
  • I'll adapt to your platform (Solidity, Rust, Cairo, etc.)
  • I'll use available tools (Slither, etc.) but work without them if unavailable
  • I'll provide file references and line numbers for all findings
  • I'll ask questions about design decisions I can't infer from code

Ready to Begin

What I'll need:

  • Access to your codebase
  • Context about your project goals
  • Any existing documentation or specifications
  • Information about deployment plans

Let's analyze your codebase and improve it using Trail of Bits' best practices!

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

7-day trend score
0

Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/sekolah76/syadagentic/guidelines-advisor/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/sekolah76/syadagentic/guidelines-advisor)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.