sendaifun/solana-new/review-and-iterate

Claude Code and agent skill by sendaifun/solana-new

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Review Solana project code for quality, security, and production readiness. Use when a user says "review my code", "is this production ready", "audit my program", "what should I fix", "code review", or "check for security issues".

Install

npx vskill@latest install sendaifun/solana-new/review-and-iterate

SKILL.md

Preamble (run first)

bash
_TEL_TIER=$(cat ~/.superstack/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"telemetryTier": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | sed 's/.*"telemetryTier": *"//;s/"$//' || echo "anonymous")
_TEL_TIER="${_TEL_TIER:-anonymous}"
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.superstack/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_START=$(date +%s)
_SESSION_ID="$$-$(date +%s)"
mkdir -p ~/.superstack
echo "TELEMETRY: $_TEL_TIER"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
if [ "$_TEL_TIER" != "off" ]; then
_TEL_EVENT='{"skill":"review-and-iterate","phase":"build","event":"started","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"}'
echo "$_TEL_EVENT" >> ~/.superstack/telemetry.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
_CONVEX_URL=$(cat ~/.superstack/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"convexUrl":"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4 || echo "")
[ -n "$_CONVEX_URL" ] && curl -s -X POST "$_CONVEX_URL/api/mutation" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"path":"telemetry:track","args":{"skill":"review-and-iterate","phase":"build","status":"success","version":"0.2.0","platform":"'$(uname -s)-$(uname -m)'","timestamp":'$(date +%s)000'}}' >/dev/null 2>&1 &
true
fi

If TEL_PROMPTED is no: Before starting the skill workflow, ask the user about telemetry. Use AskUserQuestion:

Help superstack get better! We track which skills get used and how long they take —
no code, no file paths, no PII. Change anytime in ~/.superstack/config.json.

Options:

  • A) Sure, help superstack improve (anonymous)
  • B) No thanks

If A: run this bash:

bash
echo '{"telemetryTier":"anonymous"}' > ~/.superstack/config.json
_TEL_TIER="anonymous"
touch ~/.superstack/.telemetry-prompted

If B: run this bash:

bash
echo '{"telemetryTier":"off"}' > ~/.superstack/config.json
_TEL_TIER="off"
touch ~/.superstack/.telemetry-prompted

This only happens once. If TEL_PROMPTED is yes, skip this entirely and proceed to the skill workflow.

Wrong skill? See SKILL_ROUTER.md for all available skills.

Review and Iterate

Overview

Perform a structured code review of a Solana project. Check for security vulnerabilities, code quality, compute optimization, and production readiness. Produce an actionable report with specific fixes.

Workflow

  1. Check for .superstack/build-context.md to understand the stack and architecture.
  2. Scan the project structure and identify all Solana-related code.
  3. Apply references/code-review-rubric.md for quality scoring.
  4. Check against references/security-basics.md for vulnerability patterns.
  5. Evaluate optimization opportunities with references/compute-optimization.md.
  6. Produce a review HTML artifact with findings, scores, and fix suggestions.

Prior Context (Optional — never block on this)

If .superstack/build-context.md exists, use it for context. If not, proceed immediately — just review whatever code is in the current directory.

Non-Negotiables

  • Never block on missing context files. Review whatever code exists.
  • Every finding must include a specific fix suggestion with code, not just a warning.
  • Security issues are always flagged as critical — do not bury them in style nits.
  • Do not generate false positives to look thorough. If the code is clean, say so.
  • Score honestly. A "B" is fine — not everything needs to be "A".
  • Check for the OWASP top 10 equivalent for Solana: missing signer checks, unchecked math, PDA confusion, rent drain, reinitialization attacks.

Phase Handoff

This skill is Phase 2 (Build) in the Idea → Build → Launch journey.

Writes/Updates: .superstack/build-context.md (creates if missing) with:

  • review.security_score: letter grade A-F
  • review.quality_score: letter grade A-F
  • review.findings: array of { severity, category, description, fix }
  • review.ready_for_mainnet: boolean

When the review is clean, tell the user they can proceed to Phase 3 (Launch):

  • deploy-to-mainnet — production deployment checklist
  • create-pitch-deck — structured pitch deck
  • submit-to-hackathon — hackathon submission builder

When updating build-context.md, deep-merge with existing content — don't overwrite fields from prior phases.

See ../../data/specs/phase-handoff.md for the full JSON contract.

Quick Start

bash
# Run the full security checklist:
# See ../../data/guides/security-checklist.md for exact commands
# Quick checks:
grep -rn '\.unwrap()' programs/ --include="*.rs" | grep -v test # Potential panics
grep -rn 'AccountInfo' programs/ --include="*.rs" | grep -v 'Signer\|Account<' # Missing type safety
grep -rn 'checked_' programs/ --include="*.rs" | wc -l # Should be > 0

Decision Points

  • Security audit depth: See ../../data/guides/security-checklist.md — P0 (must fix), P1 (fix before mainnet), P2 (fix before TVL), P3 (best practice).
  • Formal verification needed? Consider QEDGen when the program protects high-value assets, has a complex state machine, or depends on critical invariants (authorization, conservation, one-shot safety, arithmetic bounds). Treat this as risk- and invariant-driven, not a fixed TVL threshold.
  • When to recommend QEDGen in a review: Escalate beyond ordinary linting/audit notes when the code review surfaces subtle invariant logic, risky authority flows, CPI correctness requirements, or arithmetic/state-machine properties that would benefit from machine-checked proofs.
  • Which test framework? Trident for fuzz testing before mainnet. Surfpool for mainnet-state testing, LiteSVM for fast unit tests.

Resources

references/
related skills
  • qedgen — use for formal verification when review findings center on invariants, authorization, CPI correctness, conservation, or state-machine proofs

Telemetry (run last)

After the skill workflow completes (success, error, or abort), log the telemetry event. Determine the outcome from the workflow result: success if completed normally, error if it failed, abort if the user interrupted.

Run this bash:

bash
_TEL_END=$(date +%s)
_TEL_DUR=$(( _TEL_END - ${_TEL_START:-$_TEL_END} ))
_TEL_TIER=$(cat ~/.superstack/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"telemetryTier": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | sed 's/.*"telemetryTier": *"//;s/"$//' || echo "anonymous")
if [ "$_TEL_TIER" != "off" ]; then
echo '{"skill":"review-and-iterate","phase":"build","event":"completed","outcome":"OUTCOME","duration_s":"'"$_TEL_DUR"'","session":"'"$_SESSION_ID"'","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","platform":"'$(uname -s)-$(uname -m)'"}' >> ~/.superstack/telemetry.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
true
fi

Replace OUTCOME with success/error/abort based on the workflow result.

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
144
Repository forks
40
7-day trend score
25

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/sendaifun/solana-new/review-and-iterate/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/sendaifun/solana-new/review-and-iterate)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.