Skill v1.0.1
currentAutomated scan100/100+2 new
name: maister:migration description: Orchestrates the complete migration workflow from current state analysis through implementation to compatibility verification. Handles technology migrations, platform changes, and architecture pattern transitions with adaptive risk assessment, incremental execution, and rollback planning. Use when migrating technologies, platforms, or architecture patterns. user-invocable: true metadata: version: "1.0.1"
Migration Orchestrator
Systematic migration workflow from current state analysis to verified migration with rollback capabilities.
Initialization
BEFORE executing any phase, you MUST complete these steps:
Step 0: Session-reminder conflict resolution (decide ONCE)
Before doing anything else, settle this policy now and do not re-litigate it at any gate:
`→ MANDATORY GATE` markers fire regardless of session-reminders, permission mode, or prior approval patterns. Auto / acceptEdits / bypassPermissions modes, reminders saying "work without stopping" / "continue without asking" / "minimize clarifying questions," and compaction summaries showing the user approving every prior gate do NOT exempt you from invoking AskUserQuestion at a gate. They apply only to your discretionary clarifications.
If you find yourself reasoning "the user has been approving everything, so I can skip this gate" or "auto-mode is on, so I should minimize questions" — that reasoning IS the failure mode. STOP and fire the gate.
Full framework rule: ../orchestrator-framework/references/orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 and § 2.1.
Step 1: Load Framework Patterns
Read the framework reference file NOW using the Read tool:
../orchestrator-framework/references/orchestrator-patterns.md- Delegation rules, interactive mode, state schema, initialization, context passing, issue resolution
Step 2: Initialize Workflow
- Capture the clock: run
date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"via Bash NOW — you do NOT know the time from context. Every timestamp written this turn (created,updated,generated,phases[].started) uses this value. Date-only orT00:00:00Zvalues are the documented failure mode (orchestrator-patterns.md § 4 Timestamp Rule). Re-rundatein later turns before writing timestamps. - Validate the flags:
--type, when passed, must be one ofcode,data,architecture,general. On any other value, print those four and STOP — do not create the task directory, do not write state. A technology name belongs in the description, not the flag; Phase 2 classifies when the flag is absent. A valid value is recorded asmigration_context.migration_type.--user-docs, when passed, is recorded asorchestrator.options.docs_enabled: true. - Create Task Items: Use
TaskCreatefor all phases (see Phase Configuration), then set dependencies withTaskUpdate addBlockedBy - Create Task Directory:
.maister/tasks/migrations/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/ - Initialize State: Create
orchestrator-state.ymlwith migration context - Set up Operator Dashboard (orchestrator-patterns.md § 8) — first read
.maister/config.ymland setorchestrator.options.html_output(default true if the file/key is absent). When `html_output` is false, SKIP this entire step — nodashboard.html, nodashboard-data.js, no browser auto-open — and proceed. Otherwise: copy../orchestrator-framework/assets/dashboard.htmlto the task root asdashboard.html, write the initialdashboard-data.js(all phases pending,task.type: "migration"), then auto-open it in the user's browser (open/xdg-open/startper platform, passing the plain absolute filesystem path — NEVER a hand-builtfile://URL; on failure just print the path — never block). On resume: re-copydashboard.htmlonly if missing; regeneratedashboard-data.jsfrom state; then auto-open it in the browser again (same opener as a new task — the OS focuses an already-open tab rather than duplicating). - Discover project documentation: Read
.maister/docs/INDEX.md(if exists), extract ALL file paths from the "Project Documentation" section — includes predefined docs AND any user-added project docs. Store asproject_context.project_doc_pathsin state.
Output:
🚀 Migration Orchestrator StartedTask: [migration description]Directory: [task-path]Dashboard: open [task-path]/dashboard.html in a browser to monitor progressStarting Phase 1: Analyze current state...
Operator Visibility (applies to every phase)
Config gate: these rules assumeoptions.html_outputis true (read from.maister/config.ymlat init, default true). When false: skip the Dashboard-upkeep rule entirely (no dashboard files, no browser open, no rewrites) and the HTML-companions rule (do NOT passhtml_style_guide_path; subagents write md only). The Artifact Summary Contract (§ 7 TL;DR blocks) andphase_summariesin state stay active either way.
Cross-cutting rules from orchestrator-patterns.md (same as the development orchestrator):
- Artifact Summary Contract (§ 7): every artifact-writing subagent prompt MUST include the contract instruction (artifacts open with TL;DR / Key Decisions / Open Questions / Risks (the writer heading is
## Open Questions / Risks)). At context extraction, liftdecisions,risks, andartifactsintophase_summaries.[phase]— verbatim, never re-summarized. - Dashboard upkeep (§ 8): rewrite
dashboard-data.jsat every phase START (markin_progressbefore delegating), BEFORE firing every exit gate (register the finished phase's artifacts/summary/decisions/risks — the operator reviews them on the dashboard while answering; status staysin_progressuntil the gate passes), after every phase completion (including skipped phases, with reason), every gate decision, every verification cycle, and at finalization. Every rewrite starts withdate -u(one call per turn). It is a terse projection of state — never duplicate artifact content into it. - HTML companions (§ 9): pass
html_style_guide_path(absolute path to../orchestrator-framework/references/html-report-style.md) to specification-creator, implementation-planner, and implementation-verifier. Register returnedhtml_pathvalues inphase_summaries.[phase].artifacts[].htmlso the dashboard hero cards link HTML first. - icon_hint values per phase: 1
analysis, 2analysis, 3spec, 4plan, 5code, 6verify, 7verify, 8docs. - State writes (§ 4 Write Rule): update
orchestrator-state.ymlkey by key in place, validate it with a re-read after every write, and stop withAskUserQuestionon a malformed file — never continue on a state file the operator tooling cannot read.
When to Use
Use for:
- Migrating from one framework/library to another (e.g., Vue 2 → Vue 3, Express → Fastify)
- Changing database platforms (e.g., MySQL → PostgreSQL, MongoDB → DynamoDB)
- Refactoring architecture patterns (e.g., REST → GraphQL, Monolith → Microservices)
- Upgrading major versions with breaking changes
DO NOT use for: New features, bug fixes, pure refactoring without technology change.
Core Principles
- Analyze Before Migrating: Understand current system before planning target state
- Risk Assessment: Classify migration type (code/data/architecture) and assess complexity
- Incremental Execution: Support phased migration with rollback points
- Rollback Planning: Document undo procedures for each migration phase
- Dual-Run Support: Enable running old and new systems in parallel during transition
Migration Types
| Type | Keywords | Strategy | Risk Focus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | framework, library, upgrade | Incremental or phased | Breaking changes, API differences | |
| Data | database, schema, data migration | Dual-run (zero downtime) | Data integrity, checksums | |
| Architecture | REST→GraphQL, monolith→microservices | Dual-run or phased | Compatibility, rollback |
Phase Configuration
| Phase | content | activeForm | Agent/Skill | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Analyze current state" | "Analyzing current state" | codebase-analyzer | |
| 2 | "Plan target state and gaps" | "Planning target state and gaps" | gap-analyzer | |
| 3 | "Gather requirements & create migration strategy" | "Gathering requirements & creating migration strategy" | Direct + specification-creator (subagent) | |
| 4 | "Plan implementation" | "Planning implementation" | implementation-planner (subagent) | |
| 5 | "Execute migration" | "Executing migration" | implementation-plan-executor | |
| 6 | "Verify and test compatibility" | "Verifying and testing compatibility" | implementation-verifier | |
| 7 | "Resolve verification issues" | "Resolving verification issues" | Direct (conditional) | |
| 8 | "Generate documentation" | "Generating documentation" | user-docs-generator (optional) |
Workflow Phases
Phase 1: Current State Analysis & Clarifications
Purpose: Comprehensive analysis of current system before migration, followed by scope/requirements clarification Execute:
- Skill tool -
maister:codebase-analyzer - Update state with analysis results
- Direct - use AskUserQuestion for max 5 critical clarifying questions about migration scope, target system, and constraints
- Save clarifications to
analysis/clarifications.md
Output: analysis/current-state-analysis.md, analysis/clarifications.md State: Update migration_context.current_system, migration_context.clarifications_resolved, migration_context.phase_summaries.current_state_analysis
→ AUTO-CONTINUE — Do NOT end turn, do NOT prompt user. Proceed immediately to Phase 2.
Phase 2: Target State Planning & Gap Analysis
Purpose: Define target system and identify migration gaps Execute: Task tool - maister:gap-analyzer subagent Output: analysis/target-state-plan.md State: Update migration_context.migration_type, target_system, migration_strategy, risk_level, breaking_changes, migration_context.phase_summaries.gap_analysis
Gap Analyzer Tasks:
- Define target system from migration description
- Identify gaps (features to migrate, APIs to adapt, data to transform)
- Classify migration type (code/data/architecture/general), keeping a type supplied by
--type - Recommend migration strategy (incremental/big-bang/dual-run/phased)
- External research via WebSearch for version upgrades
→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).
AskUserQuestion - Display executive summary before asking. Extract from gap analysis: current system overview, target system, migration type classified, number of gaps identified, recommended strategy, risk level. Format as brief overview then "Continue to migration strategy?"
Phase 3: Migration Requirements & Strategy Specification
Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate theAskUserQuestiontool call from Phase 2 in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases,TaskUpdate) without a correspondingAskUserQuestioncall are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.
Purpose: Gather migration requirements, then create detailed migration specification with rollback procedures Execute:
Part A — Migration Requirements Gathering (inline):
- Direct - use AskUserQuestion for migration-specific requirements (3-5 questions):
- Migration scope and boundaries (what's in/out of migration)
- Rollback expectations and downtime tolerance
- Data migration specifics (if data migration type)
- Dual-run requirements (if applicable)
- Existing code/config to preserve
- Frame as confirmable assumptions: "I assume X, is that correct?"
- Save gathered requirements to
analysis/requirements.md
Part B — Specification Creation (subagent):
- Task tool -
maister:specification-creatorsubagent
Context to pass to subagent: task_path, task_type (migration), task_description, requirements_path (analysis/requirements.md), project_context_paths (INDEX.md + project_doc_paths from state — all discovered project docs), migration_type, current_system, target_system, risk_level, breaking_changes, phase_summaries (current_state_analysis, gap_analysis), html_style_guide_path (for the spec.html companion)
Output: analysis/requirements.md, implementation/spec.md, analysis/rollback-plan.md, optionally analysis/dual-run-plan.md State: Update rollback_plan_created, dual_run_configured, migration_context.phase_summaries.specification
→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).
AskUserQuestion - Display executive summary before asking. Read implementation/spec.md and extract: migration strategy chosen, scope boundaries, rollback approach, breaking changes identified, key constraints. Format as brief overview then "Continue to implementation planning?"
Phase 4: Implementation Planning
Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate theAskUserQuestiontool call from Phase 3 in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases,TaskUpdate) without a correspondingAskUserQuestioncall are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.
Purpose: Break migration into task groups with rollback steps Execute: Task tool - maister:implementation-planner subagent Output: implementation/implementation-plan.md with rollback procedures State: Update task groups and dependencies
Context to pass to subagent: task_path, task_type (migration), migration_type, task_description, phase_summaries (current_state_analysis, gap_analysis, specification), html_style_guide_path (for the implementation-plan.html companion)
→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).
AskUserQuestion - Display executive summary before asking. Read implementation/implementation-plan.md and extract: number of task groups, total steps, rollback steps included, key dependencies, execution sequence. Format as brief overview then "Continue to execute migration?"
Phase 5: Migration Execution
Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate theAskUserQuestiontool call from Phase 4 in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases,TaskUpdate) without a correspondingAskUserQuestioncall are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.
Purpose: Execute migration steps with incremental verification
Delegate implementation to the maister:implementation-plan-executor skill regardless of task size — it owns wave dispatch, progress tracking, and the work-log; the orchestrator never writes migration code itself.
INVOKE NOW — Skill tool call:
Execute: Skill tool - maister:implementation-plan-executor Output: Implemented migration changes, implementation/work-log.md State: Update implementation progress, extract migration_context.phase_summaries.implementation
📋 Standards Reminder: Review .maister/docs/INDEX.md before implementing.
⚠️ POST-IMPLEMENTATION CONTINUATION — After the skill completes and returns control:
- HTML plan reconciliation (backstop for syncs missed during waves): if
implementation/implementation-plan.htmlexists, for every group whose md checkboxes are all[x], run the executor's idempotent marker-flip command (sedflippingdata-step="N\.[0-9]*" class="step todo"anddata-group="N" class="group todo"todone). VERIFY: when all md steps are checked,grep -c 'class="step todo"' implementation/implementation-plan.htmlmust return 0. - Read
orchestrator-state.ymlto confirm you are the orchestrator - Update state: add Phase 5 to
completed_phases - Proceed to Phase 6
→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).
AskUserQuestion - Display executive summary before asking. Extract from phase_summaries.implementation and implementation/work-log.md: migration steps completed, files changed, test results, rollback readiness status. Format as brief overview then "Continue to verification?"
Phase 6: Verification + Compatibility Testing
Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate theAskUserQuestiontool call from Phase 5 in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases,TaskUpdate) without a correspondingAskUserQuestioncall are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.
Purpose: Verify migration success with compatibility and rollback testing Execute: Skill tool - maister:implementation-verifier Output: verification/implementation-verification.md, verification/compatibility-test-results.md State: Update verification results
Migration-Specific Checks:
- Verify old system still works (if dual-run)
- Test rollback procedures (non-destructive)
- Validate data integrity (for data migrations)
- Check performance benchmarks (before/after)
⚠️ POST-VERIFICATION CONTINUATION — After the skill completes and returns control:
- Read
orchestrator-state.ymlto confirm you are the orchestrator - Update state: add Phase 6 to
completed_phases - Evaluate verdict: if PASS → Phase 8, if fixable issues → Phase 7, otherwise stop workflow
→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).
AskUserQuestion - Display executive summary before asking. Extract from verification results: overall verdict, issue counts by severity, compatibility test results, data integrity status, rollback test results. Format as detailed overview then "Continue to Phase [7 or 8]?"
Phase 7: Migration Issue Resolution (Conditional)
Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate theAskUserQuestiontool call from Phase 6 in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases,TaskUpdate) without a correspondingAskUserQuestioncall are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.
Purpose: Fix verification issues through direct editing and re-verification Execute: Direct - apply fixes, re-verify Output: Updated code, verification_context.fixes_applied State: Update reverify_count, decisions_made
Skip if: verdict = PASS
Process:
- Display detailed issue breakdown grouped by category and severity, listing location, description, and fixability
- Present all critical + warning issues as a numbered list
- AskUserQuestion — "Which issues should I fix?" with options: "Fix all fixable issues" / "Let me choose specific issues" / "Skip fixes, proceed as-is"
- Fix selected issues
- AskUserQuestion — "Re-run verification to check fixes?" with options: "Yes, re-run verification" / "No, proceed to next phase"
- If re-run → re-invoke
maister:implementation-verifier→ return to Step 1 - Max 3 iterations
Data Safety Critical: HALT on any data integrity issue - never auto-fix data problems. Always present data issues to user with rollback option.
Exit Conditions:
- ✅ No critical issues remain → Proceed to Phase 8
- ⚠️ Max iterations (3) reached → Ask user: proceed with warnings or rollback
- ❌ Data integrity issues → HALT immediately, recommend rollback
→ MANDATORY GATE — fires regardless of permission mode, session-reminders, or prior approval patterns. Invoke AskUserQuestion now. Proceeding without a user response is a protocol violation (orchestrator-patterns.md § 2 / § 2.1).
AskUserQuestion - Display executive summary: total issues found, issues fixed, issues remaining by severity. Then "Continue to documentation?"
Phase 8: Documentation (Optional)
Phase entry self-check: Before executing this phase, locate theAskUserQuestiontool call from the preceding phase in this conversation. If you cannot point to its call ID, STOP and fire that gate now. State updates (completed_phases,TaskUpdate) without a correspondingAskUserQuestioncall are protocol violations — never paper over a missed gate by updating state.
Purpose: Create migration guide for end users Execute: Task tool - maister:user-docs-generator subagent Output: documentation/migration-guide.md State: Set documentation complete
Skip if: options.docs_enabled = false
Documentation Covers:
- Migration overview and goals
- Prerequisites and preparation steps
- Step-by-step migration procedure
- Rollback procedures
- Troubleshooting common issues
Before closing the workflow (whether or not this phase ran — when it is skipped, this step follows the Phase 7 gate): Reconcile artifacts against disk — compare every artifacts[] entry in state with what actually exists and name every missing path in the summary (orchestrator-patterns.md § 10).
→ End of workflow
Domain Context (State Extensions)
Migration-specific fields in orchestrator-state.yml:
migration_context:migration_type: "code" | "data" | "architecture" | "general"current_system:description: nulltechnologies: []target_system:description: nulltechnologies: []migration_strategy:approach: "incremental" | "big-bang" | "dual-run" | "phased"phases: []risk_level: nullbreaking_changes: []rollback_plan_created: falsedual_run_configured: falseclarifications_resolved: falsephase_summaries:# Every entry also carries the shared base shape (orchestrator-patterns.md § 4):# decisions: [] risks: [] artifacts: [{path, label, html}]current_state_analysis: {summary: null}gap_analysis: {summary: null}specification: {summary: null}implementation: {summary: null}external_research:performed: falsecategory: nullbreaking_changes: []migration_guide_url: nullverification_context:last_status: nullissues_found: nullfixes_applied: []decisions_made: []reverify_count: 0orchestrator:options:html_output: true # Seeded from .maister/config.yml at init (default true). Gates dashboard + HTML companions.docs_enabled: false # true when `--user-docs` was passed
Task Structure
.maister/tasks/migrations/YYYY-MM-DD-migration-name/├── orchestrator-state.yml├── dashboard.html # Operator dashboard (copied plugin asset — never model-generated)├── dashboard-data.js # Dashboard data projection (rewritten per phase/gate)├── analysis/│ ├── current-state-analysis.md # Phase 1│ ├── target-state-plan.md # Phase 2│ ├── requirements.md # Phase 3│ ├── rollback-plan.md # Phase 3│ └── dual-run-plan.md # Phase 3 (if dual-run)├── implementation/│ ├── spec.md # Phase 3│ ├── spec.html # Phase 3 (HTML companion)│ ├── implementation-plan.md # Phase 4│ ├── implementation-plan.html # Phase 4 (HTML companion)│ └── work-log.md # Phase 5├── verification/│ ├── implementation-verification.md # Phase 6│ ├── implementation-verification.html # Phase 6 (HTML companion)│ └── compatibility-test-results.md # Phase 6└── documentation/└── migration-guide.md # Phase 8 (optional)
Auto-Recovery
| Phase | Max Attempts | Strategy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Expand search patterns, prompt user for file paths | |
| 2 | 2 | Re-prompt for target details | |
| 3 | 2 | Re-gather requirements, re-invoke spec-creator subagent, regenerate rollback plan | |
| 4 | 2 | Regenerate with migration constraints | |
| 5 | 5 | Fix syntax errors, prompt user on repeated failure | |
| 6 | 3 | Fix-then-reverify. HALT on data integrity issues | |
| 8 | 1 | Generate text-only without screenshots |
Command Integration
Invoked via:
/maister:migration [description] [--type=code|data|architecture|general] [--user-docs] [--sequential](new)/maister:migration [task-path] [--from=PHASE] [--sequential](resume)
Flags:
--type=code|data|architecture|general: Migration category (affects risk focus). One of those four values; any other value stops at initialization before a task directory exists. Absent, Phase 2 classifies the migration. Name technologies in the description — they belong incurrent_system/target_system, not in this flag.--user-docs: Generate the Phase 8 migration guide. Persisted asorchestrator.options.docs_enabled: trueinorchestrator-state.yml. Defaults to off.--from=PHASE: Resume from specific phase--sequential: Disable parallel wave dispatch inimplementation-plan-executor; run one task group at a time. Persisted asorchestrator.options.sequential: trueinorchestrator-state.yml. Defaults to off (parallel waves).
Task directory: .maister/tasks/migrations/YYYY-MM-DD-task-name/