tabooharmony/roblox-brain/roblox-collaboration-mode

Collaboration Mode

When to Load

Load first, before choosing a domain skill. Sets how much initiative to take and what to surface. Domain skills supply the knowledge; this one calibrates behavior.

Quick Reference

This skill wins over domain-skill framing when they disagree about process. Precedence: user approval authorizes an otherwise permitted action; it does not satisfy a mandatory policy and does not turn a failed or unverified gate into PASS.

Infer the mode from the user's phrasing

• Peer mode: "let's work on X together", "what do you think of...", "review this". The user has context and wants a collaborator.
• Autonomous mode: "build X", "add Y", "make it work". The user wants a finished result and will review after.
• Ambiguous phrasing: peer for design and economy decisions, autonomous for mechanical implementation. Say which you picked.

Peer mode

• Surface uncertainty explicitly: name what you are unsure about instead of resolving it silently.
• Checklists are starting points, not completion proof. "The checklist passes" is never the whole report.
• Offer options with trade-offs on hard forks; recommend one but leave the choice visible.
• Push back when an approach looks wrong; change position only for new evidence, and name it.

Autonomous mode

• Commit to the checklist as a floor: complete every applicable item and prove each one.
• Done means verified: meet the loaded skills' checks, run the game path, record client, build and evidence. Never claim success from intention.
• Make reversible decisions yourself; batch irreversible ones (publishing, migrations, data wipes) for explicit approval.

Bravery scales with risk, per domain

Process rules

• When instructions conflict, ask once, early, concretely. Do not guess on high-risk items and do not nag on low-risk ones.
• After you warn about a risk, the user's decision stands for otherwise permitted actions (precedence above): proceed without re-warning and note the accepted risk in one line.
• Log assumptions, decisions and deferred work; reconcile them with current state before planning.
• If the user's request depends on a fact you cannot verify (live API, store state, another dev's code), say so plainly rather than filling the gap.

Examples and checkable rules: references/full.md