<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentLLM-judged scan90/100
tannhatcms/jarvis/ams-ai-chatbot-builder
──Details
PublishedOctober 23, 2026 at 11:30 AM
Content Hashsha256:f4e2f1dbf861842b...
Git SHA90bdc475a088
──Files
Files (1 file, 3.8 KB)
SKILL.md3.8 KBactive
SKILL.md · 78 lines · 3.8 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: ai-chatbot-builder description: Build AI chatbots end to end — conversation design, persona, retrieval grounding, escalation, and deployment. Use when creating a chatbot for support, sales, or internal assistance. category: ai-research


AI Chatbot Builder

A good chatbot is a designed conversation, not a model with a text box. This skill covers the full build: defining the job, designing the dialogue, grounding answers, handling failure gracefully, and shipping.

Overview

Start from the job: what questions should this bot answer, and what actions should it take? Design the conversation — greeting, disambiguation, answer, follow-up — before writing prompts. Ground answers in your knowledge base so the bot says true things. Plan the failure paths: confusion, out-of-scope requests, angry users, and the handoff to humans. Then ship with analytics, because the first version is a hypothesis about what users will ask.

When to use

  • Customer support, sales assistance, or internal helpdesk automation.
  • FAQ-style bots where answers exist in documentation.
  • Lead qualification or intake bots with structured data capture.
  • Replacing or upgrading a rules-based bot with an LLM-powered one.

Core concepts

  • Conversation design: the happy path plus the top failure paths, scripted as flows. Greeting

→ intent → resolve → confirm → close. Design the unhappy paths with equal care.

  • Persona: the bot's voice — tone, formality, name, boundaries. Consistent persona builds

trust; document it so every prompt matches.

  • Grounding: answers built from retrieved sources (docs, KB articles) with citations. The

difference between a helpful bot and a confident liar.

  • Intent handling: recognize what the user wants — including multi-intent and ambiguous

messages — and disambiguate explicitly rather than guessing.

  • Escalation: the human handoff — when (confidence low, sensitive topic, user asks), and how

(with full context transferred, not a cold restart).

  • Analytics: track intents, resolution rate, escalation rate, user satisfaction, and the

"unknown" bucket. The unknown bucket is your roadmap.

Practical workflow

  1. Define scope: the top 20 questions/intents from real user data (tickets, logs). If you don't

have data, interview the team that talks to users.

  1. Build the knowledge base: clean, current source documents; chunk and index for retrieval.
  2. Design conversation flows for the top intents plus failure paths (confused, out-of-scope,

frustrated).

  1. Implement with grounding: retrieve → generate with citations → confidence check → answer

or escalate.

  1. Test with real user phrasings — messy, typo'd, ambiguous — not your clean test cases.
  2. Launch to a slice of traffic; review the unknown bucket weekly; expand scope based on data.
text
Bot spec template:
SCOPE: <top intents — from real data>
PERSONA: <name, tone, formality, boundaries>
SOURCES: <knowledge base docs + freshness owner>
FLOWS: <happy paths + confusion + out-of-scope + escalation>
ESCALATE: <triggers + context handoff format>
METRICS: <resolution %, escalation %, CSAT, unknown-bucket size>

Common pitfalls

  • Scope creep at launch: trying to answer everything on day one. Launch narrow, expand from the

unknown bucket.

  • Ungrounded answers: the bot improvising from model memory. Ground everything; abstain when

sources are silent.

  • No escalation path: trapping frustrated users in a bot loop. Always offer a human, early.
  • Testing with clean inputs: real users are messy. Test with typos, slang, multi-intent

messages.

  • Ignoring the unknown bucket: the list of unhandled questions is the highest-value analytics

you have. Review it weekly.

  • Set and forget: knowledge goes stale, intents drift. Assign a KB owner and a review cadence.
All versions