<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentLLM-judged scan90/100
tannhatcms/jarvis/ams-citation-manager
──Details
PublishedOctober 24, 2026 at 04:27 AM
Content Hashsha256:60c3a57f749c9257...
Git SHA474e2a475663
──Files
Files (1 file, 3.6 KB)
SKILL.md3.6 KBactive
SKILL.md · 74 lines · 3.6 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: citation-manager description: Manage citations and references — collecting sources, organizing libraries, formatting bibliographies, and keeping reference integrity. Use when writing anything that cites sources. category: ai-research


Citation Manager

Citations are the paper's supply chain: every claim traceable to its source. Managing them means collecting sources systematically, organizing them so you can find anything, formatting consistently, and — critically — verifying that every citation is real and says what you claim.

Overview

The workflow: capture sources as you read (never "I'll find it later"), store them with notes on why they matter, cite-while-you-write with keys instead of hand-typed references, and generate the bibliography from the library. The integrity rule: every in-text citation matches a real source you've read, and every bibliography entry is cited. Reference managers automate formatting; they don't automate honesty.

When to use

  • Writing papers, theses, reports, or any document with references.
  • Building a personal research library over time.
  • Collaborating: shared libraries keep everyone's citations consistent.
  • Cleaning up a manuscript's references before submission.

Core concepts

  • Capture at reading time: save the full citation + PDF + your notes the moment you read

something useful. "I'll relocate it later" fails reliably.

  • Cite keys: stable keys (smith2024attention) used in drafts; the formatted reference is

generated, never hand-typed. Renumbering-proof.

  • Annotated library: each entry with a one-line note — what it claims, why you cited it.

Future you will thank present you.

  • Style consistency: one citation style per document (APA, IEEE, Chicago…), applied by the

tool, not by hand. Switching styles should be one setting.

  • Reference integrity: every citation verified — the source exists, you read the relevant

part, it supports your claim. AI-generated citations must be checked individually.

  • Deduplication: the same source saved three ways creates triple entries. Merge duplicates;

keep one canonical record.

Practical workflow

  1. Set up the library before writing: folder structure or tags by project/topic.
  2. For each source read: save citation metadata, the file, and a 2-line note (claim + relevance).
  3. Write with cite keys; never type a formatted reference by hand.
  4. Before submission: run the integrity check — every key resolves, every entry is cited, no

duplicates, style consistent.

  1. Verify AI-suggested citations individually: confirm the source exists and supports the claim.
  2. Archive the library with the manuscript version so the reference set is reproducible.
text
Source note template:
KEY: smith2024attention
CLAIM: <what the paper shows, in your words>
USE: <why you're citing it — which argument it supports>
READ: <which sections you actually read>
LIMIT: <caveats relevant to your use>

Common pitfalls

  • Phantom citations: references that don't exist — the classic AI failure mode. Verify every

single one.

  • Citation without reading: citing the abstract or a citation-of-a-citation. Read the part you

rely on.

  • Hand-formatted references: typed bibliographies that break on every edit. Generate from keys.
  • No notes: a library of 500 PDFs with no memory of why each mattered. Annotate at capture time.
  • Style drift: mixed formats in one document. Set the style once; let the tool enforce it.
  • Uncited bibliography entries: sources in the list that nothing cites (or claims nothing

supports). Audit both directions.

All versions