tmforum-oda/oda-agent-skills-marketplace/check-usecase-maturity
Claude Code and agent skill by tmforum-oda/oda-agent-skills-marketplace
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Given a TM Forum ODA use-case id (TMFSxxx), reads its cached frontmatter and returns a plain-language maturity/trust verdict -- whether it's safe to build against today. Reads only YAML frontmatter, no document-body parsing. Use this before starting requirements or test-case work against any TMFSxxx use case.
Install
npx vskill@latest install tmforum-oda/oda-agent-skills-marketplace/check-usecase-maturitySKILL.md
Check Use-Case Maturity — Skill Instructions
What this skill answers
"Is TMFSxxx safe to build against right now?" — a plain-language verdict, not a raw dump of frontmatter fields. Reads only YAML frontmatter, zero document-body prose parsing.
Where the data lives
Given an id like TMFS030, the file is at a known path — no directory scan, no search:
Read just the YAML frontmatter block (between the two --- lines at the top). The fields that matter for this skill:
| Field | Meaning | |
|---|---|---|
maturity | Alpha / Beta / GA — how settled the use case's content is | |
approval_status | Member Evaluated / Team Approved / TM Forum Approved — how much TM Forum review it's had | |
release_status | Pre-production / Production — TM Forum's own publication-track label | |
version | the document's own version string, for citing in the verdict |
status is just "{maturity} - {approval_status}" concatenated — don't re-derive it, and don't rely on it alone either. maturity and approval_status are surfaced as separate fields specifically because they can, and do, disagree — see the decision table below.
If the file doesn't exist at that path, say so plainly — don't guess a nearby id or silently fall back to the matrix/index files. A missing use case isn't this skill's job to explain; point at knowledge/index/usecase-list.json's status_in_ig1228 field if the caller wants to know why it isn't there.
Decision table
Do not treat maturity: GA alone as "safe." TM Forum's own catalog listing marks every Available document identically, whether it's a year-stable GA spec or a first-draft Alpha — and GA maturity and TM Forum Approved approval do NOT always travel together. TMFS008 and TMFS019A are both maturity: GA but only approval_status: Team Approved, not TM Forum Approved — a real, current example in this corpus, not a hypothetical edge case. Read both fields, always; never shortcut to a verdict from maturity alone.
maturity | approval_status | Verdict | |
|---|---|---|---|
GA | TM Forum Approved | Safe to build against. Fully reviewed and stable; treat as a firm dependency. | |
GA | Team Approved | Content is settled, sign-off is not yet complete. The use case itself won't change shape, but it hasn't cleared full TM Forum review — flag this distinction explicitly rather than reporting it as equivalent to a fully-approved GA document. | |
Beta | Member Evaluated | Provisional — expect changes. Usable for early exploration or a spike, not as a committed dependency. Re-check before any deliverable ships against it. | |
Alpha | Member Evaluated | First draft. Do not build production dependencies on this yet. Treat any component/API links from this use case as directional, not final. | |
| anything else | anything else | Don't force it into the rows above — state the raw maturity/approval_status pair and say explicitly that this combination hasn't been seen in the corpus before, rather than silently picking the nearest row. |
release_status: Pre-production vs Production is TM Forum's own separate publication-track signal — report it alongside the verdict (e.g. "GA / TM Forum Approved, but still Pre-production release status") rather than folding it into the maturity/approval verdict above; it's supporting evidence, not a fifth row of the table.
Output format
A short verdict, not a field dump. Example, for TMFS030:
TMFS030 (v1.1.0) — Beta / Member Evaluated, Pre-production releasestatus. Provisional — expect changes; usable for exploration, not yet asa committed dependency.
Always cite the id, version, and both maturity/approval_status verbatim (not paraphrased) alongside the plain-language verdict, so a reader can see the raw fields the verdict was derived from and disagree with the interpretation if they want to.
What this skill does NOT do
- Does not read the use case's body (Executive Summary, Description,
sequence diagrams) — that's capture-requirements-from-usecase / generate-test-cases-from-usecase's job.
- Does not resolve component/API links or check whether those are
not_yet_specified/fetch_failed — this skill is about the use case document's own maturity, not its dependencies' maturity. (A natural follow-on skill, not built yet: cross-check a use case's linked components/APIs for their own status too.)
- Does not query TM Forum's website — everything it needs is already in
knowledge/; a skill must be able to answer "is this safe to build against?" without a network call.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/check-usecase-maturity/SKILL.md
Popularity
- 7-day trend score
- 0
Not refreshed yet.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/tmforum-oda/oda-agent-skills-marketplace/check-usecase-maturity)