ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment

Claude Code and agent skill by ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

WHAT - Evidence-based technical unit assessment for repositories, platforms, frontend, backend,

Install

npx vskill@latest install ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment

SKILL.md

Technical Unit Assessment (WHAT)

Assess a technical unit: frontend app, backend API, data platform, infrastructure/IaC scope, mobile app, AI/ML pipeline, or another technical workload.

Run `project-assessment-evidence` first. Use `project-assessment` as the router for multi-unit assessments.

Out of scope

  • Does NOT score indicators without evidence — mark as Not assessed
  • Does NOT make technical decisions — scores inform, humans decide
  • Does NOT produce final report without `output-handshake`

Unit intake

Ask before scoring:

  • Unit name and type (frontend / backend / infra / data / mobile / AI)
  • Repositories, services, infrastructure scopes, or pipelines included
  • Technical decision ownership (team, client, shared, unknown)
  • Assessment period
  • Authoritative systems for code, docs, CI/CD, incidents, observability, security

Workflow

  1. Run `project-assessment-evidence` to build evidence map
  2. Select indicator groups matching the unit type (see references/indicator-groups.md)
  3. Score only indicators with evidence; mark rest as Not assessed
  4. Note confidence and missing evidence per score
  5. Apply `output-handshake` before final scorecard

Scoring rules

Use the 1–5 scale from references/indicator-groups.md. Do not average unrelated indicators without explaining weighting. Request validator for subjective scores.

References

  • references/indicator-groups.md — all indicator groups + scoring scale + AI-native readiness
  • references/default-template.md — technical unit scorecard template
  • references/example-frontend-assessment.md — example assessment for a frontend team

Delegates to

NeedSkill
Evidence intake`project-assessment-evidence`
Multi-unit routing`project-assessment`
Deep UI/UX review`figma` / `figma-implement-design`
Repo discovery`assistant`
Final output gate`output-handshake`

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
19
Repository forks
5
7-day trend score
20

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Not refreshed yet.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.