<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/launch-readiness
──Details
PublishedSeptember 28, 2026 at 02:26 PM
Content Hashsha256:a2671354836fe094...
Git SHAb08f7a7772e7
──Files
Files (1 file, 3.6 KB)
SKILL.md3.6 KBactive
SKILL.md · 92 lines · 3.6 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: launch-readiness description: Playbook for safe product launches — phased rollout strategies, beta cohort design, readiness checklists, rollback criteria, and post-launch watch periods. Used by launch-manager. when_to_use: | Use when planning a launch — phased rollout, beta cohorts, readiness checklist, rollback criteria, watch period. Primarily for launch-manager. allowed-tools: Read, Write


Launch Readiness — playbook

A launch is a phased exposure, not a switch. Plan the cohorts, the gates, and the rollback path before the first user sees the change.

1. Phased rollout — the four typical phases

  1. Internal — team uses it on prod data, with full instrumentation.
  2. Beta cohort — a curated, small group of real users (10–100).
  3. Canary — a slice of the user base (1% → 10% → 50%).
  4. General availability (GA) — all users.

Each phase has a gate. The gate is testable: "X is true OR pause." Skipping a phase is fine if the risk is genuinely low — but say so out loud.

2. Beta cohort design

  • Who: users who match the target audience AND will give feedback —

heavy users, vocal users, design partners.

  • Size: 10–100 typically. Below 10 is anecdotal; above 100 is hard to

support.

  • Duration: 1–4 weeks. Long enough to surface real usage; not so long

users disengage.

  • Feedback loop: a defined channel (a Slack room, a weekly call, an

in-product survey). Without this it is just a small launch.

  • Exit criteria: testable conditions to advance — usage frequency,

satisfaction, defect rate, support volume.

3. Launch-readiness checklist — per phase

A readiness checklist is a list of yes/no testable items. Example for internal → beta:

  • [ ] All P0/P1 bugs from QA closed.
  • [ ] Tracking events firing per the metrics plan (verified in staging).
  • [ ] Onboarding flow tested end-to-end on a clean account.
  • [ ] Support has the FAQ / runbook.
  • [ ] Docs published for the new flow.
  • [ ] Rollback procedure tested in staging.

"Feels ready" is not a checklist item.

4. Rollback criteria — be specific

A rollback plan that says "we'll roll back if it breaks" is not a plan. Specific signals with thresholds:

  • Error rate on the new flow > 1% over 5 minutes → rollback.
  • North Star metric drops > 10% in 24h vs baseline → rollback.
  • Support ticket volume > 3× normal for the affected area → rollback.
  • A confirmed data-corruption incident → immediate rollback.

For each signal: who decides, how quickly, and the procedure. Test the rollback procedure in staging before relying on it.

5. Post-launch watch period

Each phase has a soak time — how long it must be stable before advancing.

  • Internal: a few days of real use.
  • Beta: 1–2 weeks of normal usage.
  • Canary 1%: 24–48h with no signal trip.
  • Canary 10%: 2–3 days.
  • Canary 50% → GA: 3–7 days.

Do not advance during a weekend or holiday unless someone is actively watching.

6. Anti-patterns to avoid

  • "Big bang" launches with no rollback path.
  • Beta cohort with no feedback channel (it is just a small launch).
  • Readiness checklists with non-testable items ("looks good", "feels right").
  • Rollback "criteria" that are not specific signals.
  • Advancing phases because the calendar says so, not because the signals do.
  • No defined decision-maker for rollback — paralysis when it matters.

7. Output shape

A launch plan that shows: phased rollout with named phases and gates; beta cohort spec; per-phase testable readiness checklists; specific rollback criteria + procedure + decision-maker; per-phase watch period.

All versions