<< All versions
Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100vibeeval/vibecosystem/refactor
──Details
PublishedApril 29, 2026 at 10:41 PM
Content Hashsha256:54fec7ddca14e7e7...
Git SHA6172d4ac24fc
──Files
Files (1 file, 4.8 KB)
SKILL.md4.8 KBactive
SKILL.md · 208 lines · 4.8 KB
version: "1.0.0"
name: refactor description: Code refactoring workflow - analyze → plan → implement → review → validate
/refactor - Refactoring Workflow
Safe refactoring with review gates.
When to Use
- "Refactor X"
- "Clean up this code"
- "Extract this into a module"
- "Improve the architecture of Y"
- Large-scale code restructuring
- Technical debt reduction
Workflow Overview
┌──────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌───────────┐│ phoenix │───▶│ plan- │───▶│ kraken │───▶│plan-reviewer│───▶│ arbiter ││ │ │ agent │ │ │ │ │ │ │└──────────┘ └────────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └───────────┘Analyze Plan Implement Review Verifycurrent changes refactor changes tests pass
Agent Sequence
| # | Agent | Role | Output | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | phoenix | Analyze current code, identify improvement areas | Analysis report | |
| 2 | plan-agent | Create safe refactoring plan | Step-by-step plan | |
| 3 | kraken | Implement the refactoring | Code changes | |
| 4 | plan-reviewer | Review changes for correctness | Review report | |
| 5 | arbiter | Verify all tests still pass | Test report |
Refactoring Principles
- Tests first: Ensure adequate test coverage before refactoring
- Small steps: Each change should be independently verifiable
- Behavior preserved: No functional changes during refactor
- Reviewable: Changes should be easy to review
Execution
Phase 1: Analyze
Task(subagent_type="phoenix",prompt="""Analyze for refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]Identify:- Current pain points- Code smells- Improvement opportunities- Risk areas- Test coverage gaps""")
Phase 2: Plan
Task(subagent_type="plan-agent",prompt="""Plan refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]Analysis: [from phoenix]Create:- Step-by-step refactoring plan- Each step should be:- Small and focused- Independently testable- Reversible- Identify files affected- Risk mitigation strategy""")
Phase 3: Implement
Task(subagent_type="kraken",prompt="""Implement refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]Plan: [from plan-agent]Requirements:- Follow plan exactly- Run tests after each step- Stop if tests fail- NO behavior changes""")
Phase 4: Review
Task(subagent_type="plan-reviewer",prompt="""Review refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]Changes: [git diff from kraken]Check:- Behavior preserved- No unintended changes- Code quality improved- Patterns consistent""")
Phase 5: Validate
Task(subagent_type="arbiter",prompt="""Validate refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]- Run full test suite- Verify no regressions- Check type errors- Run linting""")
Refactoring Types
Extract Module
phoenix → plan-agent → kraken → plan-reviewer → arbiter
Rename/Restructure
phoenix → kraken → arbiter (simpler, skip detailed planning)
Architecture Change
phoenix → plan-agent → [kraken → plan-reviewer] × N phases → arbiter
Example
User: /refactor Extract the validation logic into a separate moduleClaude: Starting /refactor workflow...Phase 1: Analyzing current structure...[Spawns phoenix]Found: Validation logic spread across 4 files- form.ts (lines 45-120)- api.ts (lines 200-280)- user.ts (lines 15-45)- order.ts (lines 88-130)Phase 2: Planning extraction...[Spawns plan-agent]Plan:1. Create src/validation/index.ts2. Extract common validators3. Update imports one file at a time4. Run tests after each changePhase 3: Implementing...[Spawns kraken]Completed all 4 steps, tests green after eachPhase 4: Reviewing changes...[Spawns plan-reviewer]✅ All behavior preserved✅ DRY improved (removed 45 duplicate lines)✅ New structure consistentPhase 5: Final validation...[Spawns arbiter]✅ 312 tests passing, 0 regressionsRefactoring complete!
Safety Flags
--dry-run: Plan but don't implement--step-by-step: Pause after each change for approval--coverage-check: Require >80% coverage before proceeding