vp-k/flutter-craft/flutter-subagent-dev

Trust tier 3
  • community
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Use when executing Flutter implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

Install

npx vskill@latest install vp-k/flutter-craft/flutter-subagent-dev

SKILL.md

Flutter Subagent-Driven Development

Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.

Core principle: Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review = high quality Flutter code, fast iteration

Announce at start: "I'm using the flutter-subagent-dev skill to execute this plan."

When to Use

Have implementation plan?
├─ NO → Use flutter-brainstorming first
└─ YES → Tasks mostly independent?
├─ NO → Tightly coupled → Use flutter-executing instead
└─ YES → Stay in this session?
├─ YES → Use flutter-subagent-dev (this skill)
└─ NO → Use flutter-executing (parallel session)

vs. Flutter Executing (batch mode):

  • Same session (no context switch)
  • Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)
  • Two-stage review after each task
  • Faster iteration

The Process

1. Read plan, extract all tasks, create todo entries (task tracking tool)
↓
2. For each task:
├─ Dispatch implementer subagent
├─ Implementer asks questions? → Answer, then proceed
├─ Implementer implements, runs flutter analyze, commits
├─ Dispatch spec reviewer subagent
├─ Spec compliant?
│ ├─ NO → Implementer fixes, re-review
│ └─ YES → Continue
├─ Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent
├─ Quality approved?
│ ├─ NO → Implementer fixes, re-review
│ └─ YES → Mark task complete
└─ Next task
↓
3. After all tasks:
├─ Dispatch final code reviewer
└─ Use flutter-finishing skill

Subagent Prompt Templates

Implementer Subagent

Dispatch with subagent_type: "flutter-craft:flutter-dart-specialist" — its agent definition carries the Flutter/Dart implementation norms (Riverpod patterns, widget principles, performance, recommended packages) so they don't need to be pasted into the prompt.

markdown
You are implementing Task N: [task name]
## Task Description
[Full task text from plan - copy exactly]
## Context
-Project: Flutter app using [BLoC/Provider/Riverpod]
-Architecture: Clean Architecture
-This task is part of: [feature name]
-Previous tasks completed: [list]
-Dependencies: [what this task depends on]
## Layer
[Domain / Data / Presentation / Test]
## Before You Begin
If you have questions about:
-Clean Architecture placement
-State management approach
-Widget composition
-Test strategy
Ask before implementing.
## Your Job
1.Implement exactly as specified in task
2.Run `flutter analyze` - must show no issues
3.Commit with conventional commit message
4.Self-review: Check against task requirements
5.Report what you implemented
## Verification
After implementation:
$ flutter analyze lib/features/<feature>/
Expected: No issues found!
Spec Reviewer Subagent
markdown
You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.
## What Was Requested
[Full task requirements from plan]
## What Implementer Claims They Built
[From implementer's report]
## CRITICAL: Do Not Trust the Report
Verify everything independently by reading actual code.
**DO NOT:**
-Take their word for what they implemented
-Trust claims about completeness
-Accept their interpretation of requirements
**DO:**
-Read the actual code they wrote
-Compare actual implementation to requirements line by line
-Check for missing pieces
-Look for extra features not in spec
## Your Job
Read the implementation code and verify:
**Missing requirements:**
-Did they implement everything requested?
-Are there requirements they skipped?
**Extra/unneeded work:**
-Did they build things not requested?
-Did they add "nice to haves" not in spec?
**Flutter-Specific Checks:**
-Is the layer correct (Domain/Data/Presentation)?
-Does Clean Architecture structure match?
-Are dependencies pointing correct direction?
**Report:**
-✅ Spec compliant (everything matches after code inspection)
-❌ Issues found: [list specifically what's missing or extra, with file:line references]
Code Quality Reviewer Subagent

Dispatch with subagent_type: "flutter-craft:flutter-code-reviewer" — the full quality checklist (Clean Architecture, state management, widget quality, Dart style, priority-based test coverage) lives in that agent definition and is the single source of truth. Do not paste a checklist into the prompt.

markdown
You are reviewing Flutter code quality after spec compliance is confirmed.
## What Was Implemented
[Description]
## Git Range to Review
Base: {BASE_SHA}
Head: {HEAD_SHA}
Apply your full review checklist. Additionally verify that tests actually
test logic (not just mocks).
## Output Format
### Strengths
[What's well done?]
### Issues
#### Critical (Must Fix)
[Bugs, security issues, broken functionality]
#### Important (Should Fix)
[Architecture problems, missing features, test gaps]
#### Minor (Nice to Have)
[Style, optimization]
### Assessment
**Ready to proceed?** [Yes/No/With fixes]

Example Workflow

You: I'm using Flutter Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.
[Read plan: docs/plans/auth-plan.md]
[Extract all 5 tasks with context]
[Create todo entries for all tasks]
Task 1: User Entity (Domain Layer)
[Dispatch implementer subagent with full task text]
Implementer: "Implementing User entity in domain layer..."
- Created lib/features/auth/domain/entities/user.dart
- flutter analyze: No issues found!
- Committed: "feat(auth): add User entity"
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - User entity matches requirements
[Dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer:
Strengths: Clean entity, proper const constructor
Issues: None
Assessment: Approved
[Mark Task 1 complete]
Task 2: AuthRepository Interface (Domain Layer)
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
Implementer: "Question: Should login return Either<Failure, User> or just User?"
You: "Use Either<Failure, User> pattern with fpdart package"
Implementer: "Got it. Implementing..."
- Created auth_repository.dart with Either return types
- flutter analyze: No issues found!
- Committed
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ❌ Issues:
- Missing: logout() method specified in plan
- Extra: Added refreshToken() not in spec
[Implementer fixes]
Implementer: Added logout(), removed refreshToken()
[Spec reviewer reviews again]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant
[Dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: ✅ Approved
[Mark Task 2 complete]
... (continue for remaining tasks)
[After all tasks]
[Dispatch final code reviewer for entire feature]
[Use flutter-finishing skill]

Red Flags

Never:

  • Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
  • Proceed with unfixed issues
  • Start code quality review before spec compliance ✅
  • Let implementer skip flutter analyze
  • Ignore subagent questions

If subagent asks questions:

  • Answer clearly about Clean Architecture placement
  • Clarify state management approach
  • Provide context about existing patterns

If reviewer finds issues:

  • Implementer fixes them
  • Reviewer reviews again
  • Repeat until approved

REQUIRED SUB-SKILL

After all tasks complete: → flutter-craft:flutter-finishing (present completion options)

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 90 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewPassed

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
7
Repository forks
3
7-day trend score
10

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 8 May 2026, 5 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/vp-k/flutter-craft/flutter-subagent-dev/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/vp-k/flutter-craft/flutter-subagent-dev)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.