version: "1.0.1" name: structural-trading-gate description: "Unified zero-emotion variance shield for capital markets (FX, crypto, CFDs) and poker. Absorbs trading-risk-gate + zenith-execution + trade-journal-analyzer into one engine." vibe: "The math trades. You just execute." context_trigger: "trade, poker, sizing, bankroll, drawdown, kelly, stop loss, position size, variance, risk reward, lot size, pips, ruin, MTT, buy-in, commission drag, layering, grid, oil, XBRUSD, EURUSD" auto-invoke: true model: default source: "Retroactively compiled from 1,900+ sessions (2025-2026) via skill-compiler" compiled_from: "protocols/trading/TRD-*, skills/trading-risk-gate, skills/zenith-execution, skills/trade-journal-analyzer" absorbs: "trading-risk-gate, zenith-execution, trade-journal-analyzer" meta_patterns: [MP-2, MP-4, MP-7, MP-11] pinned: true

Structural Trading Gate — The Zero-Emotion Variance Shield

Compiled: 2026-05-11 (retroactive synthesis of all trading sessions)

Problem Class: Any capital allocation question — FX, crypto, CFDs, poker, casino. Pre-trade safety, position sizing, post-trade analytics.

Axiom: "In non-ergodic systems, the strategy that maximizes EV is the one most likely to kill you. Survival > Optimization."

When to Use

Invoke whenever the user mentions:

• Any trade setup, entry, or sizing question
• Bankroll management (poker or trading)
• Drawdown analysis or recovery
• Commission/friction cost optimization
• Post-trade review or journal analysis
• "Should I hold over the weekend?"

Solution Architecture

Pre-Trade: The Three-Gate Pipeline

GATE 1: Law of Ruin          GATE 2: Ergodicity           GATE 3: WR Dominance
┌─────────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────────┐
│ P(Ruin) > 5%?       │ ──▶ │ Non-ergodic?         │ ──▶ │ WR < Breakeven?     │
│ 5 Domains:          │     │ Absorbing barrier?   │     │ Variance Drag > EV? │
│ Bio/Legal/Fin/      │     │ P(survive N) < 80%?  │     │ RR structure viable? │
│ Social/Psych        │     │                      │     │                      │
│ VETO if YES ❌      │     │ VETO if YES ❌       │     │ WARN if YES ⚠️      │
└─────────────────────┘     └─────────────────────┘     └─────────────────────┘

Position Sizing: Half-Kelly (DEC-046)

Full Kelly:  f* = (bp − q) / b
Half-Kelly:  f  = f* / 2
 
Where:
  b = net odds (reward ÷ risk)
  p = probability of winning
  q = 1 − p
 
Example (10% EV, 1:3 R:R):
  b = 3, p = 0.55, q = 0.45
  f* = (3 × 0.55 − 0.45) / 3 = 0.40 (40% — suicidal)
  f  = 0.40 / 2 = 0.20 (20% — still aggressive)
  Practical: Cap at 1-2% risk per trade for operational safety.

Rule: Half-Kelly is the MAXIMUM. Industry standard 1-2% risk per trade is the operational floor.

The Variance Shields

The Iron Laws

Layering Strategy (Advanced)

For mean-reversion and grid-based entries:

Layer 1: 30% of intended position at first signal
Layer 2: 30% at confirmation (e.g., structure break)
Layer 3: 40% at optimal entry (e.g., liquidity sweep)
 
Total risk across all layers: Still ≤ 2% of capital

The Efficiency-Survival Inversion (MP-2)

Rule: Growth = Edge − (Variance² / 2). Variance is a SUBTRACTION term. High WR structurally dominates High RR (TRD-367).

Post-Trade: Journal Analysis

After every trade or session:

1. Classify the outcome: Win/Loss/Breakeven
2. Classify the process: Good Process / Bad Process
3. Map to drawdown type:

• Type A: Bad luck (good process, bad outcome) → Continue
• Type B: Bad execution (bad process) → Fix the leak
• Type C: System drift (rules changed) → Recalibrate

1. Log friction costs: Spread + commission + swap = REAL cost per trade

Output Template

TRADE GATE REPORT
─────────────────
Setup:          [Description]
Gate 1 (Ruin):  [✅ PASS / ❌ VETO — domain: ...]
Gate 2 (Ergo):  [✅ PASS / ❌ VETO — P(survival): X%]
Gate 3 (WR/RR): [✅ PASS / ⚠️ WARN — variance drag: ...]
Position Size:  [X% of capital = $Y / Z lots]
Stop Loss:      [$X / Y pips]
Risk:Reward:    [1:X]
Weekend Check:  [CLEAR / CLOSE BEFORE FRIDAY]
Commission:     [$X per round-trip / Y% of expected profit]
 
VERDICT: [CLEARED / VETOED / CONDITIONAL]

Absorbed Protocols & Skills

Trading Protocols (7)

TRD-367 (High WR Supremacy), TRD-368 (Trade Structure Levers), TRD-369 (Fuck-Unfuck Principle), TRD-46 (Trading Methodology), TRD-56 (Shopee Refugee Arbitrage), TRD-57 (Influencer Put Option), TRD-65 (Arbitrage Formula)

Decision Protocols (Trading-Related)

DEC-046 (Kelly Mandate), DEC-050 (Risk Pareto), DEC-101 (Inverse Sizing Matrix)

Absorbed Skills

• trading-risk-gate → Pre-trade 3-gate pipeline
• zenith-execution → Half-Kelly, stop-loss calc, Monte Carlo, portfolio rebalance
• trade-journal-analyzer → Post-trade drawdown classification

Key Case Studies

CS-367 (High WR Supremacy), CS-461 (Multi-Timeframe Cascade), CS-462 (Mean Reversion), CS-463 (Fog of War), CS-465 (EURUSD Structure), CS-466 (BCG Trade Classification), CS-487 (Layering Strategy BTC), CS-493 (Toto EEV), CS-495 (Macro-Meso-Micro Barbell), CS-500 (Trading System Map), CS-502 (MTT Variance), CS-509 (FX Sim Stats Audit), CS-525 (FX Data Refined), CS-534 (Stop-Out Opportunity Cost), CS-560 (Stochastic-Deterministic Engine Map)

Failure Modes & Mitigations

Validated Patterns (Empirical)

• [V] High WR > High RR: Variance Drag (V²/2) geometrically destroys low-WR portfolios. A 70% WR / 1:1 RR system dominates a 30% WR / 1:3 RR system over N>100 trades. | Reapply: Every system design.
• [V] Commission Drag Kills Edge: 46% commission drag on FX vs 0% on oil CFDs. Switching arenas is a higher-EV move than optimizing entries. | Reapply: Every new instrument evaluation.
• [V] Half-Kelly is Maximum: Full Kelly = theoretical ceiling (Carnot Engine). Half-Kelly = operational reality. | Reapply: Every position sizing calculation.
• [V] Weekend Gaps are Non-Ergodic: A single weekend gap can wipe weeks of gains. The expected cost of holding > expected gain. | Reapply: Every Friday.

References

• META_PATTERNS.md — MP-2 (Efficiency-Survival Inversion)
• CS-560 — The Engine Map
• bionic-decision-engine — Parent engine for non-capital decisions