wirasm/prp/prp-review

Review a Pull Request

Coordinate an evidence-based PR review. Reviewer agents are the only path for judging the code: do not add an inline review pass before or after them.

Input: $ARGUMENTS (if absent, use the current branch's PR).

Let workflows/agents.md own scope selection, reviewer dispatch, correction verification, aggregation, and publication. Pass the operator's scope intent and flags through without rebuilding those contracts here.

Resolve the canonical store before starting:

# --- PRP store resolver (canonical; keep byte-identical across skills) ---
# Adopt the store that already records this root; mint a key only when none does.
_gd="$(git rev-parse --path-format=absolute --git-common-dir 2>/dev/null)"
case "$_gd" in */.git) _root="${_gd%/.git}" ;; "") _root="$PWD" ;; *) _root="$_gd" ;; esac
_root="$(cd "$_root" && pwd -P)"
_name="$(basename "$_root" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr -cs 'a-z0-9' '-' | sed 's/^-*//;s/-*$//')"
_home="${PRP_HOME:-$HOME/.prp}"
_hit="$(grep -lsF "\"path\": \"$_root\"" "$_home"/*/project.json 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
PRP_DIR="${_hit%/project.json}"
[ -n "$PRP_DIR" ] || PRP_DIR="$_home/${_name:-project}-$(printf %s "$_root" | git hash-object --stdin | cut -c1-8)"
mkdir -p "$PRP_DIR"; [ -f "$PRP_DIR/project.json" ] || printf '{"path": "%s", "name": "%s"}\n' "$_root" "${_name:-project}" > "$PRP_DIR/project.json"

Read workflows/agents.md and execute it end-to-end. Before producing the report, read templates/review-report.md and follow its output contract exactly.

In helm, /prp-companion makes the review's page live: it writes pr-{NUMBER}-review.data.json beside the page and opens it, so the operator's status changes and replies on the page reach you as mail. Answer them as the companion's live mode says, and return the data file's path with the companion's.

Resources

• workflows/agents.md — PR resolution, validation, agent scopes, aggregation, and publication
• templates/review-report.md — canonical local and GitHub review format