xueruisu/paper-prism/review-simulator

Review Simulator

Read ../_shared/paperprism_codex_native.md before acting.

Goal

Review the current paper or section as a skeptical reviewer and convert feedback into actionable revisions.

Workflow

1. Read the draft, paper.tex, ClaimEvidenceMap, WritingPlan, and PaperState if available.
2. Evaluate novelty, technical quality, evidence rigor, clarity, significance, and limitations.
3. Group issues as must-fix, should-fix, and writing-only.
4. Map each issue to a claim, section, paragraph, sentence slot, or missing evidence item.
5. Route evidence gaps to experiment-planner, novelty risks to novelty-evaluator, and prose fixes to paper-writer.
6. Mark sentence slots verified only after they are already supported and pass review.
7. Update PaperState with revision tasks.

Rules

• Do not hide missing evidence as a prose issue.
• Do not claim reviewer risk decreased unless the underlying evidence or text changed.
• Keep reviewer comments concrete and actionable.
• If a review issue requires adding, deleting, or reordering sentences, route to logical-template-builder to revise the ClozeBlueprint before prose repair.
• Never mark a sentence verified directly from planned.
• Before final export, report planned_sentences and unsupported_sentences; block export unless both are zero.

Expected Outputs

• Reviewer-style critique.
• Prioritized revision plan.
• Slot-level or claim-level revision targets when possible.
• Minimal user questions for blocked revisions.