zai-org/synapse/research-paper-writer

Trust tier 2
  • community
LLM review pending
Source check pending

Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.

Creates formal academic research papers following IEEE/ACM formatting standards with proper structure, citations, and scholarly writing style. Use when the user asks to write a research paper, academic paper, or conference paper on any topic.

Install

npx vskill@latest install zai-org/synapse/research-paper-writer

SKILL.md

Research Paper Writer

Overview

This skill guides the creation of formal academic research papers that meet publication standards for IEEE and ACM conferences/journals. It ensures proper structure, formatting, academic writing style, and comprehensive coverage of research topics.

Workflow

1. Understanding the Research Topic

When asked to write a research paper:

  1. Clarify the topic and scope with the user:
  • What is the main research question or contribution?
  • What is the target audience (conference, journal, general academic)?
  • What is the desired length (page count or word count)?
  • Are there specific sections required?
  • What formatting standard to use (IEEE or ACM)?
  1. Gather context if needed:
  • Review any provided research materials, data, or references
  • Understand the domain and technical background
  • Identify key related work or existing research to reference
2. Paper Structure

Follow this standard academic paper structure:

1. Title and Abstract
- Concise title reflecting the main contribution
- Abstract: 150-250 words summarizing purpose, methods, results, conclusions
2. Introduction
- Motivation and problem statement
- Research gap and significance
- Main contributions (typically 3-5 bullet points)
- Paper organization paragraph
3. Related Work / Background
- Literature review of relevant research
- Comparison with existing approaches
- Positioning of current work
4. Methodology / Approach / System Design
- Detailed description of proposed method/system
- Architecture diagrams if applicable
- Algorithms or procedures
- Design decisions and rationale
5. Implementation (if applicable)
- Technical details
- Tools and technologies used
- Challenges and solutions
6. Evaluation / Experiments / Results
- Experimental setup
- Datasets or test scenarios
- Performance metrics
- Results presentation (tables, graphs)
- Analysis and interpretation
7. Discussion
- Implications of results
- Limitations and threats to validity
- Lessons learned
8. Conclusion and Future Work
- Summary of contributions
- Impact and significance
- Future research directions
9. References
- Comprehensive bibliography in proper citation format
3. Academic Writing Style

Apply these writing conventions from scholarly research:

Tone and Voice:

  • Formal, objective, and precise language
  • Third-person perspective (avoid "I" or "we" unless describing specific contributions)
  • Present tense for established facts, past tense for specific studies
  • Clear, direct statements without unnecessary complexity

Technical Precision:

  • Define all acronyms on first use: "Context-Aware Systems (C-AS)"
  • Use domain-specific terminology correctly and consistently
  • Quantify claims with specific metrics or evidence
  • Avoid vague terms like "very", "many", "significant" without data

Argumentation:

  • State claims clearly, then support with evidence
  • Use logical progression: motivation → problem → solution → validation
  • Compare and contrast with related work explicitly
  • Address limitations and counterarguments

Section-Specific Guidelines:

Abstract:

  • First sentence: broad context and motivation
  • Second/third: specific problem and gap
  • Middle: approach and methodology
  • End: key results and contributions
  • Self-contained (readable without the full paper)

Introduction:

  • Start with real-world motivation or compelling problem
  • Build from general to specific (inverted pyramid)
  • End with clear contribution list and paper roadmap
  • Use examples to illustrate the problem

Related Work:

  • Group related work by theme or approach
  • Compare explicitly: "Unlike [X] which focuses on Y, our approach..."
  • Identify gaps: "However, these approaches do not address..."
  • Position your work clearly

Results:

  • Present data clearly in tables/figures
  • Describe trends and patterns objectively
  • Compare with baselines quantitatively
  • Acknowledge unexpected or negative results
4. Formatting Guidelines

IEEE Format (default):

  • Page size: A4 (210mm × 297mm)
  • Margins: Top 19mm, Bottom 43mm, Left/Right 14.32mm
  • Two-column layout with 4.22mm column separation
  • Font: Times New Roman throughout
  • Title: 24pt bold
  • Author names: 11pt
  • Section headings: 10pt bold, numbered (1., 1.1, 1.1.1)
  • Body text: 10pt
  • Figure/Table captions: 8pt
  • Line spacing: Single
  • Paragraph: No indentation, 3pt spacing between paragraphs
  • Figures: Centered, with captions below
  • Tables: Centered, with captions above

ACM Format (alternative):

  • Standard ACM conference proceedings format
  • Single-column abstract, two-column body
  • Include CCS Concepts and Keywords sections after abstract
  • Use ACM reference format for citations
5. Citations and References

In-text citations:

  • Use numbered citations: "Recent work [1, 2] has shown..."
  • Multiple citations in chronological order: [3, 7, 12]
  • Reference specific sections: "As demonstrated in [5, Section 3]..."

Reference formatting (IEEE style):

[1] A. Author, B. Author, and C. Author, "Title of paper," in Proc. Conference Name, Year, pp. 123-456.
[2] D. Author, "Title of journal article," Journal Name, vol. X, no. Y, pp. 123-456, Month Year.
[3] E. Author, Book Title, Edition. City: Publisher, Year.

Reference list requirements:

  • Alphabetically ordered by first author's last name (or numbered by citation order)
  • Include DOI or URL when available
  • Minimum 15-20 references for a full paper
  • Mix of recent (last 5 years) and foundational works
6. Content Generation Process

Step-by-step approach:

  1. Create outline
  • Develop detailed section-by-section outline
  • Define key points for each section
  • Identify where figures/tables are needed
  1. Draft sections iteratively
  • Start with methodology (core contribution)
  • Then introduction (now that contribution is clear)
  • Related work (to position the contribution)
  • Results and evaluation
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Abstract last (summary of complete paper)
  1. Add citations
  • Reference related work throughout
  • Support claims with evidence from literature
  • Create comprehensive reference list
  1. Review and refine
  • Check logical flow between sections
  • Ensure consistency in terminology
  • Verify all figures/tables are referenced in text
  • Confirm abstract matches content
  • Validate citation completeness

Examples

Example 1: User asks for a survey paper

User: "Write a research paper surveying recent advances in context-aware systems"
Response:
1. Clarify scope: "I'll create a survey paper on context-aware systems. A few questions:
- Should I focus on specific aspects (e.g., requirements engineering, implementation techniques)?
- What time period for 'recent' (last 5 years, 10 years)?
- Target length: 10-15 pages, or 20-30 pages comprehensive survey?
- IEEE or ACM format?"
2. After clarification, create outline showing:
- Taxonomy of context-aware systems
- Survey methodology
- Classification scheme
- Section-by-section coverage of different aspects
- Trends and future directions
3. Draft paper following survey structure with extensive related work coverage

Example 2: User asks for an experimental paper

User: "Write a paper about my new algorithm for detecting hallucinations in vision-language models"
Response:
1. Gather details about:
- Algorithm approach and novelty
- Experimental setup and datasets used
- Results and metrics
- Comparison baselines
2. Structure as experimental paper:
- Introduction: motivation for hallucination detection
- Related work: existing detection methods
- Proposed method: detailed algorithm description
- Experiments: datasets, metrics, setup
- Results: quantitative comparison with baselines
- Analysis: ablation studies, error analysis
- Conclusion: contributions and future work
3. Emphasize reproducibility and empirical validation

Resources

references/
  • writing_style_guide.md: Detailed academic writing conventions extracted from example papers
  • ieee_formatting_specs.md: Complete IEEE formatting specifications
  • acm_formatting_specs.md: Complete ACM formatting specifications
assets/
  • full_paper_template.pdf: IEEE paper template with formatting examples
  • interim-layout.pdf: ACM paper template
  • Reference these templates when discussing formatting requirements with users

Important Notes

  • Always ask for clarification on topic scope before starting
  • Quality over speed: Take time to structure properly and write clearly
  • Cite appropriately: Academic integrity requires proper attribution
  • Be honest about limitations: Acknowledge gaps or constraints in the research
  • Maintain consistency: Terminology, notation, and style throughout
  • User provides the research content: This skill structures and writes; the user provides the technical contributions and findings

Security

  • Security scanPassed, 93 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
  • Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.

Quality evaluation

  • Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.

Source

Popularity

Repository stars
407
Repository forks
28
7-day trend score
30

Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 28 Jul 2026, 3 months ago.

Works with

Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.

  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub Copilot
  • Windsurf
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • Cline
  • Amp
  • Roo Code
  • Goose
  • Continue
  • Kilo Code
  • Junie
  • Trae
  • OpenHands
  • Qwen Code
  • AI Agent
  • Tabnine Chat
  • Sourcegraph Cody
  • Amazon Q
  • Firebase Genkit
  • Sweep
  • Devin
  • Phind
  • Mentat
  • Claude Desktop
  • Aider
  • GPT Pilot
  • Plandex
  • bolt.new
  • v0
  • Replit Agent
  • Anse
  • TypingMind
  • BetterChatGPT
  • LibreChat
  • Warp AI
  • Pieces
  • Fig AI
Embed badge
vskill VERIFIED badge
[![vskill VERIFIED](https://verified-skill.com/api/v1/skills/zai-org/synapse/research-paper-writer/badge)](https://verified-skill.com/skills/zai-org/synapse/research-paper-writer)

Something wrong with this skill or its page? Tell us.