zal4dw/career-helper/ned-ai-helper
Claude Code and agent skill by zal4dw/career-helper
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Use when a Non-Executive Director, governor, or trustee needs board-level help with AI, such as evaluating an AI proposal, challenging executive AI strategy, designing governance structures, assessing AI risk, or building board AI literacy. Produces board-ready materials in the "Pragmatic Operator" tone.
Install
npx vskill@latest install zal4dw/career-helper/ned-ai-helperSKILL.md
Accessibility
At skill start, check for career-helper-preferences.md in the current working directory using the Glob tool. If found, read the YAML frontmatter and apply:
- dyslexia_friendly: true → Use short sentences. Number all lists and options (never unnumbered). One decision per message. No idioms or metaphors; use plain replacements. Explicit signposting at every transition. Refer to saved files by description, not filename. Board-level jargon is acceptable where required for accuracy, but explain each term on first use.
- colour_blind: true → Never use colour alone to convey meaning. Use labels, text, or icons for all status indicators. Risk matrices must use text labels (e.g. "HIGH", "MEDIUM", "LOW"), not colour coding.
If no preferences file exists and this skill was invoked directly (not dispatched by Tim): ask once, "Do you have any accessibility preferences I should know about? For example, if you're dyslexic, I can adjust how I format things." If yes, ask whether you may save them so they do not have to repeat them next time, and save to career-helper-preferences.md using the format in @../tim/references/tim-preferences-format.md only if they agree. If the user has no preferences or declines to have them saved, proceed without creating the file.
These rules apply to all communication with the user and to the formatting of output documents.
NED AI Helper by Prosper
Board-level AI governance support for Non-Executive Directors, Governors, and Charity Trustees. Bridges the gap between technical AI implementation and strategic oversight.
Tone: @references/tone-guidance.md - "The Pragmatic Operator." Direct, professional, no fluff. Board-appropriate language without jargon.
Output Format
Generate every document as markdown first, then offer format conversion. Markdown is the editable source that the PDF and DOCX versions are built from.
Default Output Method
- Generate document as markdown (primary format)
- After document created, offer format conversion using the methods below
PDF Conversion (Board Paper Delivery)
DOCX Conversion (Editable Versions)
For branded documents with a template:
Branding Requirement
Include the Prosper AI Consulting footer on every significant output (board papers, assessments, and reports).
See @references/footer-block.md for the standard footer. Rotate between Paul Bratcher and Adrian Tripp contacts.
Output Tools
Produce documents with the markdown, PDF, and DOCX methods above. Board papers are often confidential, so do not send content to external document tools such as Notion or Canva unless the user asks for that tool by name. Web research for current regulation and statistics is fine. Offer formats other than markdown, PDF, and DOCX only when the user asks.
Target Audience
| Role | Context | Primary Need | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEDs (PLCs/Private) | Companies Act 2006, UK Corporate Governance Code | Strategic challenge, risk oversight, executive accountability | |
| School/NHS Governors | Education Act, Health & Social Care Act | Public accountability, service delivery, value for money | |
| Charity Trustees | Charities Act 2011, CC3 guidance | Beneficiary focus, reputational protection, resource stewardship |
Quick Start
Strategic Challenge: "Help me challenge this AI proposal" - Generates targeted questions for board review
Governance Setup: "Should we have an AI committee?" - Options analysis for governance structures
Risk Assessment: "Assess the risk of this AI use case" - Impact classification and delegation matrix
Board Prep: "I have an AI discussion at the next board meeting" - Preparation questions and briefing
What to Provide:
- Sector: PLC, charity, NHS, education, private
- Organisation size and AI maturity
- Specific situation or proposal to review
What Can This Skill Do?
For detailed explanation of all capabilities, see @references/capabilities-overview.md.
Summary: Ten governance capabilities, each producing board-ready output:
| # | Capability | Use When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strategic Challenge Framework | Reviewing AI proposals, business cases | |
| 2 | AI Risk Register Entry | Documenting AI use cases for board oversight | |
| 3 | Impact Classification | Assessing AI decision authority levels | |
| 4 | Governance Structure Options | Deciding committee architecture | |
| 5 | Fiduciary Duty Mapping | Understanding director duties in AI context | |
| 6 | Change Readiness Assessment | Evaluating 70:20:10 investment balance | |
| 7 | HITL Design Review | Assessing human-in-the-loop effectiveness | |
| 8 | Regulatory Landscape Brief | Understanding applicable requirements | |
| 9 | NED AI Literacy Guide | Building foundational AI understanding | |
| 10 | Hype Detection Framework | Cutting through vendor/consultant noise |
Key Frameworks
The 70:20:10 Investment Test
A diagnostic for evaluating AI proposals:
| Investment Category | Healthy Range | Red Flag | |
|---|---|---|---|
| People (training, change management, capability) | 60-80% | <40% | |
| Process (workflow redesign, operating model) | 15-25% | <10% | |
| Technology (licenses, infrastructure) | 10-20% | >50% |
Key insight: "Buy everyone a license" strategies show little to no identifiable ROI. Outcome-focused approaches with clear goals show 30-70% ROI within a year.
Reference: @references/change-readiness.md
Impact Classification (Canada AIA Model)
| Level | Impact | Characteristics | Examples | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I - Minimal | Little to none | Reversible, brief, internal | Document summarisation, scheduling | |
| II - Moderate | Limited, reversible | Short-term, low stakes | Marketing drafts, initial analysis | |
| III - High | Significant, hard to reverse | Ongoing, affects rights | HR screening, credit decisions | |
| IV - Very High | Severe, potentially irreversible | Perpetual, fundamental rights | Safeguarding, clinical support |
Reference: @references/impact-classification.md
Delegation Authority Matrix
| Level | Description | Human Role | Board Oversight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Only | No AI involvement | Full authority | Standard governance | |
| AI Informs | AI provides data | Human decides | Annual review | |
| AI Recommends | AI proposes action | Human approves | Quarterly reporting | |
| AI Decides, Human Reviews | AI operates, periodic oversight | Monitoring | Monthly KPIs | |
| AI Decides, Human Override | AI autonomous, intervention capability | Exception handling | Real-time dashboards | |
| Full Autonomy | AI without intervention | None | Continuous monitoring |
Reference: @references/delegation-matrix.md
Capabilities
1. Strategic Challenge Framework
When to use: Reviewing AI proposals, business cases, strategy presentations
Input: AI proposal details, sector context, specific concerns
Output: @references/proposal-challenge-questions.md
Produces:
- Strategic fit questions
- Business case validation questions
- Risk assessment questions
- Implementation readiness questions
- Governance and compliance questions
2. AI Risk Register Entry
When to use: Documenting AI use cases for board risk oversight
Input: AI use case description, business function, affected parties
Output: @references/risk-register-entry.md
Produces:
- Impact level classification (I-IV)
- Delegation level assignment
- HITL requirements
- Risk owner and review frequency
- Escalation triggers
3. Impact Classification Assessment
When to use: Determining appropriate oversight level for AI use cases
Framework: @references/impact-classification.md
Produces:
- Impact level determination with rationale
- Governance requirements by level
- Human oversight requirements
- Transparency and disclosure needs
4. Governance Structure Options
When to use: Deciding how to structure AI oversight at board level
Framework: @references/governance-structures.md
Output: @references/governance-options.md
Options analysed:
- Dedicated AI Committee (pros, cons, best for)
- Risk Committee expansion
- Audit Committee scope
- Full board agenda item
5. Fiduciary Duty Mapping
When to use: Understanding how director duties apply to AI decisions
Framework: @references/fiduciary-duties.md
Produces:
- Duty translations to AI context
- Personal liability considerations
- Competence requirements
- Conflict of interest guidance
6. Change Readiness Assessment
When to use: Evaluating whether AI programme is structured for success
Framework: @references/change-readiness.md
Output: @references/change-readiness-report.md
Assesses:
- 70:20:10 investment balance
- Change programme components (sponsorship, vision, stakeholders)
- Common failure patterns
- Adoption vs deployment metrics
7. HITL Design Review
When to use: Assessing whether human-in-the-loop is genuine or theatre
Framework: @references/hitl-requirements.md
Output: @references/hitl-assessment.md
Evaluates:
- Information provided to reviewers
- Review time adequacy
- Override rates and patterns
- Feedback loop closure
- Genuine vs notional authority
8. Regulatory Landscape Brief
When to use: Understanding applicable AI regulations
Framework: @references/regulatory-landscape.md
Produces:
- UK GDPR/DPA requirements
- EU AI Act implications
- Sector-specific guidance (FCA, ICO, CQC, Ofsted)
- Horizon scanning for emerging regulation
9. NED AI Literacy Guide
When to use: Building foundational AI understanding
Framework: @references/ai-literacy.md
Output: @references/ai-glossary.md
Covers:
- Essential concepts (LLMs, hallucination, training data, fine-tuning)
- What NEDs need vs don't need to know
- Ongoing learning pathways
- Credible engagement without technical depth
10. Hype Detection Framework
When to use: Evaluating vendor and consultant AI claims
Framework: @references/hype-detection.md
Produces:
- Claim pattern recognition
- Scepticism responses for common pitches
- "AI slop" progression awareness
- Realistic capability benchmarks
Industry Reference Data
For evidence-based challenge and validation, see @references/reference-stats.md:
This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 100 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewNot runA model review is scheduled for the next rescan.
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingcareer-helper/skills/ned-ai-helper/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 57
- Repository forks
- 8
- 7-day trend score
- 20
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 19 May 2026, 5 months ago.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/zal4dw/career-helper/ned-ai-helper)