zubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude/market-brand
- community
Checking that the SKILL.md file is still in the repository.
Install
npx vskill@latest install zubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude/market-brandSKILL.md
Brand Voice Analysis and Guidelines Generation
Skill Purpose
Analyze a brand's voice, tone, and messaging across all available channels and generate a comprehensive brand voice guidelines document. This skill examines how a brand communicates, identifies patterns and inconsistencies, and produces actionable guidelines that any writer or marketer can follow to maintain brand consistency.
When to Use
- User wants to understand or document a brand's voice
- User needs brand voice guidelines for a team, freelancers, or agency
- User wants to ensure consistency across marketing channels
- User is rebranding or refining their brand identity
- User wants to compare their brand voice to competitors
- Triggered by
/market brand <url>or/market brand
How to Execute
Step 1: Gather Source Material
To analyze a brand's voice, examine content from multiple sources. Prioritize in this order:
Primary Sources (must analyze):
- Homepage -- The most curated representation of the brand
- About page -- How the brand describes itself
- Product/service pages -- How they present their offerings
Secondary Sources (analyze if available):
- Blog posts (at least 3-5 recent posts)
- Social media profiles (bio, recent posts, engagement style)
- Email newsletters (welcome email, recent sends)
- Customer-facing copy (error messages, onboarding flows, help docs)
Tertiary Sources:
- Job postings -- Reveals internal culture and values
- Press releases -- Formal communication style
- Ad copy -- Paid messaging approach
- Video scripts or podcast transcripts -- Spoken brand voice
Use browser tools or the analyze_page.py script to access web content. For social media, check the website for social links and analyze the linked profiles.
Step 2: Voice Dimension Analysis
Map the brand's voice along four primary dimensions. Each dimension is a spectrum, not a binary.
Dimension 1: Formal <-----> Casual
Where does the brand fall on the formality spectrum?
| Signal | Formal | Casual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contractions | Avoids them ("do not", "cannot") | Uses them freely ("don't", "can't") | |
| Sentence structure | Complex, longer sentences | Short, punchy sentences | |
| Vocabulary | Professional, industry-standard | Conversational, everyday words | |
| Greetings | "Dear valued customer" | "Hey there!" | |
| Pronouns | Third person ("the company", "one") | First/second person ("we", "you") | |
| Humor | Rare or absent | Frequent, natural | |
| Slang/colloquialisms | Never | Occasionally or frequently |
Score: 1 (extremely formal) to 10 (extremely casual)
Evidence required: Quote 3-5 specific examples from the source material that support your rating.
Dimension 2: Serious <-----> Playful
How much levity does the brand inject into its communication?
| Signal | Serious | Playful | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tone | Authoritative, measured | Light-hearted, fun | |
| Metaphors | Rare, conservative | Creative, unexpected | |
| Exclamation marks | Rare | Frequent | |
| Emoji use | Never | Sometimes or often | |
| Wordplay/puns | Never | Enjoys them | |
| Error messages | "An error has occurred" | "Oops! Something went sideways" | |
| Self-deprecation | Never | Occasionally |
Score: 1 (extremely serious) to 10 (extremely playful)
Dimension 3: Technical <-----> Simple
How much domain expertise does the brand assume in its audience?
| Signal | Technical | Simple | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jargon | Uses industry terms freely | Avoids or explains all jargon | |
| Acronyms | Uses without definition | Spells out on first use | |
| Detail level | In-depth explanations | High-level overviews | |
| Audience assumption | Expert audience | General audience | |
| Data/statistics | Frequent, detailed | Occasional, simplified | |
| Examples | Complex, domain-specific | Simple, relatable analogies |
Score: 1 (extremely technical) to 10 (extremely simple)
Dimension 4: Reserved <-----> Bold
How much personality and confidence does the brand project?
| Signal | Reserved | Bold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claims | Hedged ("we believe", "may help") | Direct ("we guarantee", "the best") | |
| Opinions | Neutral, balanced | Strong, opinionated | |
| Competitive references | Avoids mentioning competitors | Directly compares | |
| Personality | Professional, understated | Distinctive, memorable | |
| Promises | Conservative | Ambitious | |
| Controversy | Avoids | Embraces when aligned with values |
Score: 1 (extremely reserved) to 10 (extremely bold)
Step 3: Tone Spectrum Mapping
Beyond the four dimensions, map how the brand's tone shifts across different contexts:
| Context | Typical Tone | Example | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homepage | [Confident/Welcoming/Urgent/etc.] | "[quote from homepage]" | |
| Product description | [Informative/Persuasive/Technical/etc.] | "[quote]" | |
| Blog post | [Educational/Conversational/Authoritative/etc.] | "[quote]" | |
| Social media | [Casual/Engaging/Promotional/etc.] | "[quote]" | |
| Error/404 page | [Apologetic/Humorous/Helpful/etc.] | "[quote]" | |
| Email subject lines | [Direct/Curious/Urgent/etc.] | "[quote]" | |
| CTA buttons | [Action-oriented/Benefit-driven/Urgent/etc.] | "[quote]" | |
| Customer support | [Empathetic/Professional/Friendly/etc.] | "[quote]" |
Step 4: Brand Personality Framework
Map the brand to one of five core personality archetypes (brands may blend 1-2):
The 5 Archetypes
1. The Authority
- Characteristics: Expert, trustworthy, data-driven, established
- Voice: Confident but not arrogant, educational, precise
- Industries: Finance, healthcare, B2B enterprise, legal, consulting
- Example brands: McKinsey, IBM, Mayo Clinic
- Key phrases: "Research shows...", "Our experts...", "Industry-leading..."
2. The Innovator
- Characteristics: Forward-thinking, disruptive, visionary, tech-savvy
- Voice: Exciting, future-focused, sometimes provocative
- Industries: Tech, SaaS, startups, renewable energy
- Example brands: Tesla, Stripe, Notion
- Key phrases: "Reimagine...", "The future of...", "We're building..."
3. The Friend
- Characteristics: Warm, approachable, helpful, relatable
- Voice: Conversational, empathetic, inclusive, encouraging
- Industries: Consumer products, education, community platforms
- Example brands: Mailchimp, Slack, Duolingo
- Key phrases: "We get it...", "You've got this...", "Here to help..."
4. The Rebel
- Characteristics: Bold, challenging conventions, irreverent, passionate
- Voice: Direct, opinionated, sometimes confrontational, memorable
- Industries: Lifestyle, fitness, creative industries, direct-to-consumer
- Example brands: Nike, Oatly, Cards Against Humanity
- Key phrases: "Stop settling for...", "The truth is...", "We're done with..."
5. The Guide
- Characteristics: Wise, patient, methodical, trustworthy
- Voice: Clear, instructional, supportive, knowledgeable
- Industries: Education, professional development, tools, platforms
- Example brands: HubSpot, Khan Academy, Ahrefs
- Key phrases: "Here's how to...", "Step by step...", "The complete guide to..."
Assessment:
- Primary archetype: [which one and why]
- Secondary archetype: [if applicable]
- Archetype fit: [Strong/Moderate/Weak -- how well does the brand embody this archetype?]
Step 5: Vocabulary Analysis
Identify patterns in the brand's word choices:
Words They Use Frequently
Analyze all source material and identify the 15-20 most characteristic words or phrases. Organize by category:
Action words: (verbs they favor)
- e.g., "build", "scale", "transform", "streamline"
Descriptive words: (adjectives they use)
- e.g., "powerful", "simple", "enterprise-grade", "effortless"
Value words: (words that reflect their values)
- e.g., "transparent", "sustainable", "inclusive", "innovative"
Industry-specific terms:
- e.g., "workflow", "pipeline", "conversion", "engagement"
Words They Avoid
Identify words that are notably absent or that would feel out of character:
- Words that are too casual for the brand (if formal)
- Words that are too technical for the brand (if simple)
- Competitor terminology they deliberately avoid
- Industry cliches they seem to sidestep
Signature Phrases
Does the brand have any recurring phrases, taglines, or linguistic patterns?
- Tagline: [if they have one]
- Recurring phrases: [patterns you notice]
- Linguistic patterns: [e.g., always starts sentences with verbs, uses dashes frequently, favors short paragraphs]
Step 6: Competitor Voice Comparison
Compare the brand's voice to 2-3 key competitors:
Voice Comparison Matrix:
| Dimension | [Brand] | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Competitor 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formal <> Casual | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Serious <> Playful | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Technical <> Simple | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Reserved <> Bold | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Primary Archetype | [type] | [type] | [type] | [type] |
Differentiation Assessment:
- How distinct is the brand's voice from competitors?
- Where do voices overlap? (potential differentiation opportunity)
- What voice territory is unoccupied in the competitive landscape?
- Specific recommendations for vocal differentiation
Step 7: Consistency Audit
Assess voice consistency across all analyzed channels:
| Channel | Voice Consistency | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homepage | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [specific observations] | |
| About page | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] | |
| Blog | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] | |
| Social media | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] | |
| Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] | ||
| Product pages | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] |
Common Consistency Issues:
- Different writers creating noticeably different tones
- Social media voice drastically different from website
- Formal website copy but casual email newsletters
- Blog content written in a completely different voice than product pages
- Error messages or microcopy that feels off-brand
- Old pages that haven't been updated to match current brand voice
Overall Consistency Score: X/10
Step 8: Brand Messaging Hierarchy
Document the brand's messaging from most distilled to most expanded:
Level 1: Tagline (under 10 words)
The most compressed form of the brand message.
- Current: "[existing tagline or suggested one]"
- Assessment: Does it capture the core value proposition?
Level 2: Value Propositions (1 sentence each)
3-5 core value propositions that support the brand promise.
- "[Value prop 1]"
- "[Value prop 2]"
- "[Value prop 3]"
Level 3: Elevator Pitch (30 seconds / 75 words)
A conversational explanation of what the brand does and why it matters. "[Draft elevator pitch based on analyzed content]"
Level 4: Boilerplate (100-150 words)
The standard "about us" paragraph used in press releases, email signatures, and speaker bios. "[Draft boilerplate based on analyzed content]"
Level 5: Full Brand Story (300-500 words)
The complete narrative of who the brand is, what they stand for, and why they exist.
- Current status: [Exists/Partial/Missing]
- Recommendations for improvement
Step 9: Generate Brand Voice Documentation
Create the comprehensive Do's and Don'ts guide:
Voice Chart
Writing Do's and Don'ts
This is the start of the file. Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub.
Security
- Security scanPassed, 95 of 100Pattern checks on the skill's files.
- Model reviewPassed
Quality evaluation
- Task evaluationNot runNo evaluation yet. Run one in Skill Studio.
Source
- SKILL.md in the repositoryCheckingskills/market-brand/SKILL.md
Popularity
- Repository stars
- 340
- Repository forks
- 172
- 7-day trend score
- 29
Stars and forks are for the whole GitHub repository, not this skill alone. Refreshed 18 Mar 2026, 7 months ago.
Works with
Any agent vskill installs to: 56 targets in all. These 39 have a page on this site.
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- GitHub Copilot
- Windsurf
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- Cline
- Amp
- Roo Code
- Goose
- Continue
- Kilo Code
- Junie
- Trae
- OpenHands
- Qwen Code
- AI Agent
- Tabnine Chat
- Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q
- Firebase Genkit
- Sweep
- Devin
- Phind
- Mentat
- Claude Desktop
- Aider
- GPT Pilot
- Plandex
- bolt.new
- v0
- Replit Agent
- Anse
- TypingMind
- BetterChatGPT
- LibreChat
- Warp AI
- Pieces
- Fig AI
Embed badge
[](https://verified-skill.com/skills/zubair-trabzada/ai-marketing-claude/market-brand)